Drawing for MEGACELL

USPTO serial 79171355

MEGACELL

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 402
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
ELTON, DAVID JONATHAN
Law office
TMEG LAW OFFICE 106 - EXAMINING ATTORNEY ASSIGNED

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with MEGACELL?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
009Photovoltaic modules for production of electricity; solar modules for production of electricity; solar cells; photovoltaic cells; photovoltaic installations for generating electricity being electric photovoltaic installations; solar panels; photovoltaic panel; photovoltaic inverters; photovoltaic apparatus for converting solar radiation into electrical energy; portable solar panels for generating electricitySECTION 70 - CANCELLED—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Feb 12, 2026DETHDEATH OF INTERNATIONAL REGISTRATION—
Dec 11, 2025DETHDEATH OF INTERNATIONAL REGISTRATION—
May 5, 2017FINTFINAL DECISION TRANSACTION PROCESSED BY IB—
Apr 13, 2017FICSFINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE SENT TO IB—
Apr 13, 2017FICRFINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB—
Feb 17, 2017OPNXNOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION - PROCESSED BY IB—
Feb 1, 2017OPNSNOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION SENT TO IB—
Feb 1, 2017OPNRNOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB—
Apr 13, 2016MAB2ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - FAILURE TO RESPONDThe trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time.
Apr 13, 2016ABN2ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSEThe trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time.
Oct 2, 2015RFNTREFUSAL PROCESSED BY IB—
Sep 11, 2015RFCSNON-FINAL ACTION MAILED - REFUSAL SENT TO IB—
Sep 11, 2015RFRRREFUSAL PROCESSED BY MPU—
Sep 11, 2015RFCRNON-FINAL ACTION (IB REFUSAL) PREPARED FOR REVIEW—
Sep 10, 2015CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Sep 8, 2015MAFRAPPLICATION FILING RECEIPT MAILED—
Sep 3, 2015DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Sep 2, 2015NWOSNEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED—
Aug 28, 2015LIMILIMITATION FROM ORIGINAL APPLICATION ENTERED—
Aug 27, 2015REPRSN ASSIGNED FOR SECT 66A APPL FROM IB—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance