USPTO serial 79171537
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Blake R. Hartz
BLAKE R HARTZ WOODARD EMHARDT MORIARTY MCNETT & HEN111 MONUMENT CIRCLESUITE 3700INDIANAPOLIS, IN 46204-5137| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 001 | Enzymes used for cleaning equipment in industrial food and beverage plants, namely, amylases, lipases and cellulases for removal of food residues and other specific soils which cause cleaning challenges in food and beverage tanks and membranes and other processing units | SECTION 70 - CANCELLED | — |
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Feb 12, 2026 | DENA | NOTIFICATION OF EFFECT OF CANCELLATION OF INTL REG E-MAILED | — |
| Feb 12, 2026 | DETH | DEATH OF INTERNATIONAL REGISTRATION | — |
| Jan 29, 2026 | DENA | NOTIFICATION OF EFFECT OF CANCELLATION OF INTL REG E-MAILED | — |
| Jan 29, 2026 | DETH | DEATH OF INTERNATIONAL REGISTRATION | — |
| Feb 20, 2025 | NREP | NEW REPRESENTATIVE AT IB RECEIVED | — |
| Feb 14, 2025 | NREP | NEW REPRESENTATIVE AT IB RECEIVED | — |
| Mar 14, 2019 | NREP | NEW REPRESENTATIVE AT IB RECEIVED | — |
| Jan 24, 2019 | NREP | NEW REPRESENTATIVE AT IB RECEIVED | — |
| Apr 27, 2018 | FINT | FINAL DECISION TRANSACTION PROCESSED BY IB | — |
| Mar 8, 2018 | FICS | FINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE SENT TO IB | — |
| Mar 8, 2018 | FICR | FINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB | — |
| Mar 8, 2017 | MAB3 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - AFTER EX PARTE APPEAL | — |
| Mar 8, 2017 | ABN3 | ABANDONMENT - AFTER EX PARTE APPEAL | — |
| Mar 8, 2017 | EXPT | EXPARTE APPEAL TERMINATED | — |
| Feb 17, 2017 | OPNX | NOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION - PROCESSED BY IB | — |
| Feb 1, 2017 | OPNS | NOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION SENT TO IB | — |
| Feb 1, 2017 | OPNR | NOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB | — |
| Jan 24, 2017 | EXFB | EXPARTE APPEAL DISMISSED - FAILURE TO FILE BRIEF | — |
| Nov 14, 2016 | EXPI | EX PARTE APPEAL-INSTITUTED | — |
| Nov 14, 2016 | EXAF | EXPARTE APPEAL RECEIVED AT TTAB | — |
| May 13, 2016 | GNFN | NOTIFICATION OF FINAL REFUSAL EMAILED | — |
| May 13, 2016 | GNFR | FINAL REFUSAL E-MAILED | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| May 13, 2016 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL WRITTEN | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Apr 26, 2016 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Apr 25, 2016 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Apr 25, 2016 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Feb 26, 2016 | NREP | NEW REPRESENTATIVE AT IB RECEIVED | — |
| Nov 17, 2015 | RFNT | REFUSAL PROCESSED BY IB | — |
| Oct 23, 2015 | RFCS | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED - REFUSAL SENT TO IB | — |
| Oct 23, 2015 | RFRR | REFUSAL PROCESSED BY MPU | — |
| Oct 22, 2015 | RFCR | NON-FINAL ACTION (IB REFUSAL) PREPARED FOR REVIEW | — |
| Oct 21, 2015 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Oct 19, 2015 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Sep 8, 2015 | MAFR | APPLICATION FILING RECEIPT MAILED | — |
| Sep 3, 2015 | NWOS | NEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED | — |
| Aug 27, 2015 | REPR | SN ASSIGNED FOR SECT 66A APPL FROM IB | — |