Drawing for AGILEX

USPTO serial 79171537

AGILEX

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 402
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
Examiner
SCHIMPF, TIMOTHY O
Law office
TMO LAW OFFICE 113 - EXAMINING ATTORNEY ASSIGNED

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with AGILEX?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

Blake R. Hartz

BLAKE R HARTZ WOODARD EMHARDT MORIARTY MCNETT & HEN111 MONUMENT CIRCLESUITE 3700INDIANAPOLIS, IN 46204-5137

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
001Enzymes used for cleaning equipment in industrial food and beverage plants, namely, amylases, lipases and cellulases for removal of food residues and other specific soils which cause cleaning challenges in food and beverage tanks and membranes and other processing unitsSECTION 70 - CANCELLED

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Feb 12, 2026DENANOTIFICATION OF EFFECT OF CANCELLATION OF INTL REG E-MAILED
Feb 12, 2026DETHDEATH OF INTERNATIONAL REGISTRATION
Jan 29, 2026DENANOTIFICATION OF EFFECT OF CANCELLATION OF INTL REG E-MAILED
Jan 29, 2026DETHDEATH OF INTERNATIONAL REGISTRATION
Feb 20, 2025NREPNEW REPRESENTATIVE AT IB RECEIVED
Feb 14, 2025NREPNEW REPRESENTATIVE AT IB RECEIVED
Mar 14, 2019NREPNEW REPRESENTATIVE AT IB RECEIVED
Jan 24, 2019NREPNEW REPRESENTATIVE AT IB RECEIVED
Apr 27, 2018FINTFINAL DECISION TRANSACTION PROCESSED BY IB
Mar 8, 2018FICSFINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE SENT TO IB
Mar 8, 2018FICRFINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB
Mar 8, 2017MAB3ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - AFTER EX PARTE APPEAL
Mar 8, 2017ABN3ABANDONMENT - AFTER EX PARTE APPEAL
Mar 8, 2017EXPTEXPARTE APPEAL TERMINATED
Feb 17, 2017OPNXNOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION - PROCESSED BY IB
Feb 1, 2017OPNSNOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION SENT TO IB
Feb 1, 2017OPNRNOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB
Jan 24, 2017EXFBEXPARTE APPEAL DISMISSED - FAILURE TO FILE BRIEF
Nov 14, 2016EXPIEX PARTE APPEAL-INSTITUTED
Nov 14, 2016EXAFEXPARTE APPEAL RECEIVED AT TTAB
May 13, 2016GNFNNOTIFICATION OF FINAL REFUSAL EMAILED
May 13, 2016GNFRFINAL REFUSAL E-MAILEDA final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon.
May 13, 2016CNFRFINAL REFUSAL WRITTENA final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon.
Apr 26, 2016TEMETEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED
Apr 25, 2016CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE
Apr 25, 2016TROATEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Feb 26, 2016NREPNEW REPRESENTATIVE AT IB RECEIVED
Nov 17, 2015RFNTREFUSAL PROCESSED BY IB
Oct 23, 2015RFCSNON-FINAL ACTION MAILED - REFUSAL SENT TO IB
Oct 23, 2015RFRRREFUSAL PROCESSED BY MPU
Oct 22, 2015RFCRNON-FINAL ACTION (IB REFUSAL) PREPARED FOR REVIEW
Oct 21, 2015CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Oct 19, 2015DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER
Sep 8, 2015MAFRAPPLICATION FILING RECEIPT MAILED
Sep 3, 2015NWOSNEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED
Aug 27, 2015REPRSN ASSIGNED FOR SECT 66A APPL FROM IB

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance