Drawing for PEP'S

USPTO serial 79171651

PEP'S

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Reg. 5075597Status 404
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
Nov 8, 2016
Examiner
MURRAY, DAVID T
Law office
—

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with PEP'S?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

Andrew W. Chu

Andrew W. Chu CRAFT CHU PLLC1204 Heights BoulevardHouston, TX 77008-6918UNITED STATES

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
007[ Electric condiment mills, namely, electric pepper mills, electric salt mills ]SECTION 71 - CANCELLED—
021Hand-operated condiment mills, namely, hand-operated pepper mills, hand-operated salt millsSECTION 70 - CANCELLED—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Feb 12, 2026DENANOTIFICATION OF EFFECT OF CANCELLATION OF INTL REG E-MAILED—
Feb 12, 2026DETHDEATH OF INTERNATIONAL REGISTRATION—
Jan 15, 2026DENANOTIFICATION OF EFFECT OF CANCELLATION OF INTL REG E-MAILED—
Jan 15, 2026DETHDEATH OF INTERNATIONAL REGISTRATION—
Nov 8, 2025REM4COURTESY REMINDER - SEC. 71 (10-YR) E-MAILED—
Feb 18, 2024INNPPARTIAL INVALIDATION PROCESSED BY THE IB—
Jan 30, 2024INPSPARTIAL INVALIDATION OF REG EXT PROTECTION SENT TO IB—
Jan 29, 2024INPCINVALIDATION PROCESSED—
Jan 17, 2024INPRPARTIAL INVALIDATION OF REG EXT PROTECTION CREATED—
May 17, 2023NA75NOTICE OF ACCEPTANCE OF SEC. 71 & 15 - E-MAILED—
May 17, 2023C75PREGISTERED - PARTIAL SEC. 71 ACCEPTED & SEC. 15 ACK.—
May 16, 2023APRECASE ASSIGNED TO POST REGISTRATION PARALEGAL—
Oct 26, 2022ES75TEAS SECTION 71 & 15 RECEIVED—
Nov 8, 2021REM3COURTESY REMINDER - SEC. 71 (6-YR) E-MAILED—
Oct 16, 2020NREPNEW REPRESENTATIVE AT IB RECEIVED—
Sep 11, 2020ADCHCHANGE OF NAME/ADDRESS REC'D FROM IB—
Feb 1, 2019TCCATEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED—
Aug 4, 2017GPNXNOTIFICATION PROCESSED BY IB—
Mar 3, 2017FINOFINAL DECISION TRANSACTION PROCESSED BY IB—
Feb 9, 2017FICSFINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE SENT TO IB—
Feb 9, 2017FIMPFINAL DISPOSITION PROCESSED—
Feb 8, 2017FICRFINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB—
Nov 8, 2016R.PRREGISTERED-PRINCIPAL REGISTERYour trademark is registered on the Principal Register — the strongest form of federal trademark protection. You may use the ® symbol for the covered goods and services. Maintenance filings (Section 8 and renewals) are required to keep the registration alive.
Aug 23, 2016NPUBOFFICIAL GAZETTE PUBLICATION CONFIRMATION E-MAILED—
Aug 23, 2016PUBOPUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITIONYour mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance.
Aug 3, 2016OPNSNOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION SENT TO IB—
Aug 3, 2016OP2RNOTICE OF START OF OPPOSITION PERIOD CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB—
Aug 3, 2016NONPNOTIFICATION OF NOTICE OF PUBLICATION E-MAILED—
Jul 15, 2016PREVLAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED—
Jul 1, 2016CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER—
Jun 25, 2016TEMETEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED—
Jun 24, 2016CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Jun 24, 2016TROATEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Jun 13, 2016ARAAATTORNEY/DOM.REP.REVOKED AND/OR APPOINTEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Jun 13, 2016REAPTEAS REVOKE/APP/CHANGE ADDR OF ATTY/DOM REP RECEIVED—
May 25, 2016GNRNNOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
May 25, 2016GNRTNON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
May 25, 2016CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
May 24, 2016TEMETEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED—
May 24, 2016CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
May 19, 2016ALIEASSIGNED TO LIE—
May 12, 2016TCCATEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED—
May 10, 2016NREVNOTICE OF REVIVAL - E-MAILED—
May 9, 2016TROATEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
May 9, 2016PETGPETITION TO REVIVE-GRANTED—
May 9, 2016PROATEAS PETITION TO REVIVE RECEIVED—
May 9, 2016TCCATEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED—
May 4, 2016MAB2ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - FAILURE TO RESPONDThe trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time.
May 4, 2016ABN2ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSEThe trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time.
Oct 24, 2015RFNTREFUSAL PROCESSED BY IB—
Oct 7, 2015RFCSNON-FINAL ACTION MAILED - REFUSAL SENT TO IB—
Oct 7, 2015RFRRREFUSAL PROCESSED BY MPU—
Oct 6, 2015RFCRNON-FINAL ACTION (IB REFUSAL) PREPARED FOR REVIEW—
Oct 5, 2015CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Oct 5, 2015DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Sep 8, 2015MAFRAPPLICATION FILING RECEIPT MAILED—
Sep 4, 2015NWOSNEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED—
Sep 3, 2015REPRSN ASSIGNED FOR SECT 66A APPL FROM IB—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance