USPTO serial 79171661
COOPERS SMOKESTOP
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Reg. 5066344Status 706Renewal
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- Oct 25, 2016
- Examiner
- KELLY, JOHN M
- Law office
- Historical data usage
What this means
This registration is in, or will soon enter, a USPTO maintenance window. Missing a Section 8 or Section 9 filing can cancel the registration.
Need help with COOPERS SMOKESTOP?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Get help with this Renewal, set up monitoring, or talk with CopyMark.
Get Attorney Assistance for just $1,097*
Plus Government fees of $2,550
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Adam J. Bruno
Adam J. Bruno BAY STATE IP, LLC50 Milk Street, 16th FloorBOSTON, MA 02109United StatesGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 017 | Fire curtain barrier materials, namely, stainless steel wire reinforced glass fabric coated with a formulated micronized aluminum filled polymer | ACTIVE | — |
| 019 | Fire and smoke proof screens and fire and smoke proof roller screens, flexible screens which can be used in place of walls | ACTIVE | — |
| 024 | Fire retardant textiles and textile materials, namely, glass fiber fabric coated with a micronized aluminum filled fire-resistant polymer | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
- Other trademarks owned by Coopers Fire Limited
- Other trademarks owned by Coopers Fire Limited
- Other trademarks owned by Coopers Fire Limited
- Other trademarks in Class 017
- Other trademarks in Class 019
- Other trademarks in Class 024
- Similar marks named COOPERS SMOKESTOP
- Recently changed USPTO trademarks
- Recently filed trademarks
- Browse all trademark records
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sep 18, 2026 | NA71 | NOTICE OF ACCEPTANCE OF SEC. 71 - E-MAILED | — |
| Sep 18, 2026 | 71AG | REGISTERED-SEC.71 ACCEPTED | — |
| Sep 7, 2026 | APRE | CASE ASSIGNED TO POST REGISTRATION PARALEGAL | — |
| Jun 25, 2026 | ES71 | TEAS SECTION 71 RECEIVED | — |
| Oct 26, 2025 | REM4 | COURTESY REMINDER - SEC. 71 (10-YR) E-MAILED | — |
| Dec 12, 2024 | RNWL | INTERNATIONAL REGISTRATION RENEWED | — |
| Sep 23, 2024 | NA71 | NOTICE OF ACCEPTANCE OF SEC. 71 - E-MAILED | — |
| Sep 23, 2024 | 71AG | REGISTERED-SEC.71 ACCEPTED | — |
| Jun 28, 2024 | EROP | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION-POST REG RECEIVED | — |
| Jan 17, 2024 | PR71 | POST REGISTRATION ACTION MAILED - SEC.71 | — |
| Nov 21, 2023 | APRE | CASE ASSIGNED TO POST REGISTRATION PARALEGAL | — |
| Apr 13, 2023 | ES71 | TEAS SECTION 71 RECEIVED | — |
| Oct 25, 2021 | REM3 | COURTESY REMINDER - SEC. 71 (6-YR) E-MAILED | — |
| Jun 18, 2021 | NREP | NEW REPRESENTATIVE AT IB RECEIVED | — |
| Jun 10, 2019 | TCCA | TEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED | — |
| Feb 17, 2017 | FINO | FINAL DECISION TRANSACTION PROCESSED BY IB | — |
| Jan 26, 2017 | FICS | FINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE SENT TO IB | — |
| Jan 26, 2017 | FIMP | FINAL DISPOSITION PROCESSED | — |
| Jan 25, 2017 | FICR | FINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB | — |
| Oct 25, 2016 | R.PR | REGISTERED-PRINCIPAL REGISTER | Your trademark is registered on the Principal Register — the strongest form of federal trademark protection. You may use the ® symbol for the covered goods and services. Maintenance filings (Section 8 and renewals) are required to keep the registration alive. |
| Oct 12, 2016 | OPNX | NOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION - PROCESSED BY IB | — |
| Aug 9, 2016 | NPUB | OFFICIAL GAZETTE PUBLICATION CONFIRMATION E-MAILED | — |
| Aug 9, 2016 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Jul 20, 2016 | OPNS | NOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION SENT TO IB | — |
| Jul 20, 2016 | OP2R | NOTICE OF START OF OPPOSITION PERIOD CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB | — |
| Jul 20, 2016 | NONP | NOTIFICATION OF NOTICE OF PUBLICATION E-MAILED | — |
| Jul 7, 2016 | PREV | LAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED | — |
| Jun 30, 2016 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Jun 30, 2016 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Jun 30, 2016 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jun 30, 2016 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Jun 28, 2016 | NREV | NOTICE OF REVIVAL - E-MAILED | — |
| Jun 27, 2016 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Jun 27, 2016 | PETG | PETITION TO REVIVE-GRANTED | — |
| Jun 27, 2016 | PROA | TEAS PETITION TO REVIVE RECEIVED | — |
| Jun 9, 2016 | ARAA | ATTORNEY/DOM.REP.REVOKED AND/OR APPOINTED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Jun 9, 2016 | REAP | TEAS REVOKE/APP/CHANGE ADDR OF ATTY/DOM REP RECEIVED | — |
| May 6, 2016 | MAB2 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - FAILURE TO RESPOND | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| May 6, 2016 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Oct 30, 2015 | RFNT | REFUSAL PROCESSED BY IB | — |
| Oct 9, 2015 | RFCS | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED - REFUSAL SENT TO IB | — |
| Oct 9, 2015 | RFRR | REFUSAL PROCESSED BY MPU | — |
| Oct 9, 2015 | RFCR | NON-FINAL ACTION (IB REFUSAL) PREPARED FOR REVIEW | — |
| Oct 8, 2015 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Sep 8, 2015 | MAFR | APPLICATION FILING RECEIPT MAILED | — |
| Sep 4, 2015 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Sep 4, 2015 | NWOS | NEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED | — |
| Sep 3, 2015 | REPR | SN ASSIGNED FOR SECT 66A APPL FROM IB | — |