Drawing for DERMABIT

USPTO serial 79171882

DERMABIT

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Reg. 4957945Status 706Renewal
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
May 17, 2016
Examiner
WEIGLE, KATHERINE CONNOLLY
Law office
GENERIC WEB UPDATE

What this means

This registration is in, or will soon enter, a USPTO maintenance window. Missing a Section 8 or Section 9 filing can cancel the registration.

Need help with DERMABIT?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Get help with this Renewal, set up monitoring, or talk with CopyMark.
Get Attorney Assistance for just $299*

Plus Government fees of $850

Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

Nicholas D. Wells

Nicholas D. Wells Legends Law Group, PLLC330 N. Main St.Kaysville, UT 84037UNITED STATES

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
019Compound based on distilled bitumen and polymers, namely, roofing membranes, bituminous roof coatings and waterproofing membranes for roofing, floors and walls; waterproofing membranes made of bitumen-polymer-plastomer compound for roofing, floors and walls; damp proof membranes of synthetic plastics materials for roofing, floors and walls; bituminous products in the form of membranes for damp-proofing for roofing, floors and walls; waterproof bituminous membranes reinforced with glass fibre for roofing, floors and walls; bituminous sealing membranes, namely, bitumen-based sealants for roofing, driveways, and asphalt; roofing membranes; bitumen based compositions for building purposes; bitumen building materials; non-metal roofing, namely, bitumen containing materials; bitumen in sheet form; asphalt, pitch and bitumenACTIVE—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

DateCodeEventWhat it means
May 17, 2025REM4COURTESY REMINDER - SEC. 71 (10-YR) E-MAILED—
Mar 27, 2025RNWLINTERNATIONAL REGISTRATION RENEWED—
Oct 25, 2022NA71NOTICE OF ACCEPTANCE OF SEC. 71 - E-MAILED—
Oct 25, 202271AGREGISTERED-SEC.71 ACCEPTED—
Oct 24, 2022APRECASE ASSIGNED TO POST REGISTRATION PARALEGAL—
May 6, 2022ES71TEAS SECTION 71 RECEIVED—
May 17, 2021REM3COURTESY REMINDER - SEC. 71 (6-YR) E-MAILED—
May 5, 2017FINOFINAL DECISION TRANSACTION PROCESSED BY IB—
Aug 18, 2016XXSSGENERIC MADRID TRANSACTION SENT TO IB—
Aug 18, 2016XXCRGENERIC MADRID TRANSACTION CREATED—
Aug 17, 2016FICRFINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB—
May 17, 2016R.PRREGISTERED-PRINCIPAL REGISTERYour trademark is registered on the Principal Register — the strongest form of federal trademark protection. You may use the ® symbol for the covered goods and services. Maintenance filings (Section 8 and renewals) are required to keep the registration alive.
Mar 1, 2016NPUBOFFICIAL GAZETTE PUBLICATION CONFIRMATION E-MAILED—
Mar 1, 2016PUBOPUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITIONYour mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance.
Feb 27, 2016GPNXNOTIFICATION PROCESSED BY IB—
Feb 10, 2016OPNSNOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION SENT TO IB—
Feb 10, 2016NONPNOTIFICATION OF NOTICE OF PUBLICATION E-MAILED—
Feb 10, 2016OP2RNOTICE OF START OF OPPOSITION PERIOD CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB—
Jan 25, 2016CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER—
Jan 22, 2016TEMETEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED—
Jan 21, 2016CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Jan 21, 2016TROATEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Oct 2, 2015RFNTREFUSAL PROCESSED BY IB—
Sep 15, 2015MAFRAPPLICATION FILING RECEIPT MAILED—
Sep 14, 2015RFCSNON-FINAL ACTION MAILED - REFUSAL SENT TO IB—
Sep 14, 2015RFRRREFUSAL PROCESSED BY MPU—
Sep 12, 2015RFCRNON-FINAL ACTION (IB REFUSAL) PREPARED FOR REVIEW—
Sep 11, 2015CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Sep 10, 2015DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Sep 10, 2015NWOSNEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED—
Sep 9, 2015LIMILIMITATION FROM ORIGINAL APPLICATION ENTERED—
Sep 3, 2015REPRSN ASSIGNED FOR SECT 66A APPL FROM IB—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance