USPTO serial 79171919
BLEND-X
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Reg. 4934681Status 404
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- Apr 12, 2016
- Examiner
- AYALA, LOURDES
- Law office
- PUBLICATION AND ISSUE SECTION
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with BLEND-X?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Jeffrey H. Greger
Jeffrey H. Greger Hauptman Ham, LLP2318 Mill RoadSuite 1400Alexandria, VA 22314Goods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 007 | Electrical kitchen machines for blending, liquidizing, pureeing, mashing, mixing, pulping, kneading, grinding, mincing, chopping, slicing, grating, shredding, peeling, cutting, crushing, sieving, beating and whisking of foodstuffs, namely, electric food mixers and electric food processors; electrical food blenders; electrical food liquidisers, namely, electrical food and beverage blenders; electrical food processors; electrical food mixers; electrical food preparation machines, namely, electric food mixers and food processors for mixing, kneading, mashing, grinding, mincing, peeling, chopping, slicing, grating, shredding, blending, stirring, beating, whisking, folding, liquidizing, sieving, rolling and cutting of foodstuffs; electrical soup makers, namely electrical food blenders, electrical food blenders incorporating a cooking or heating function; electric ice-crushers; electrical food grinders; electrical food mincers; electrical food cutting machines; non-refrigerating electrical mixing machines for making ice cream or sorbets; electrical smoothie makers, namely blender machines; electrical kitchen machines, namely electric food and beverage blenders for mixing beverages; electrical juice extractors; blades adapted to fit and for use with the aforesaid electrical kitchen machines; goblets, namely glass or plastic blender jugs, adapted to fit and for use with the aforesaid electrical kitchen machines; electric attachments for use with aforesaid electrical kitchen machines, all adapted for food processing, namely, potato peelers, vegetables peelers, citrus juicers, fruit juicers, juice extractors, food slicers, food graters, powered operated food mincers, food grinders, food choppers, food beaters, electric power operated food dicers, food shredders, food grinding mills, electric pasta makers, electric pasta rollers, electric pasta cutters, food processors, food blenders, creaming beaters, electric whisks for household purposes, cutting and slicing blades for food cutting and slicing machines, blades for food grating and shredding machines, and electrical motors for all the aforesaid electrical kitchen machines | SECTION 71 - CANCELLED | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Nov 30, 2025 | DENA | NOTIFICATION OF EFFECT OF CANCELLATION OF INTL REG E-MAILED | — |
| Nov 30, 2025 | DETH | DEATH OF INTERNATIONAL REGISTRATION | — |
| Aug 20, 2023 | INNT | TOTAL INVALIDATION PROCESSED BY THE IB | — |
| Jul 31, 2023 | INTS | TOTAL INVALIDATION OF REG EXT PROTECTION SENT TO IB | — |
| Jul 31, 2023 | INPC | INVALIDATION PROCESSED | — |
| Jun 28, 2023 | INTR | TOTAL INVALIDATION OF REG EXT PROTECTION CREATED | — |
| Oct 28, 2022 | C71T | CANCELLED SECTION 71 | — |
| Apr 12, 2021 | REM3 | COURTESY REMINDER - SEC. 71 (6-YR) E-MAILED | — |
| Aug 31, 2017 | NREP | NEW REPRESENTATIVE AT IB RECEIVED | — |
| Sep 9, 2016 | FINO | FINAL DECISION TRANSACTION PROCESSED BY IB | — |
| Sep 1, 2016 | NREP | NEW REPRESENTATIVE AT IB RECEIVED | — |
| Jul 13, 2016 | FICS | FINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE SENT TO IB | — |
| Jul 13, 2016 | FIMP | FINAL DISPOSITION PROCESSED | — |
| Jul 12, 2016 | FICR | FINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB | — |
| Apr 12, 2016 | R.PR | REGISTERED-PRINCIPAL REGISTER | Your trademark is registered on the Principal Register — the strongest form of federal trademark protection. You may use the ® symbol for the covered goods and services. Maintenance filings (Section 8 and renewals) are required to keep the registration alive. |
| Jan 26, 2016 | NPUB | OFFICIAL GAZETTE PUBLICATION CONFIRMATION E-MAILED | — |
| Jan 26, 2016 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Jan 6, 2016 | NONP | NOTIFICATION OF NOTICE OF PUBLICATION E-MAILED | — |
| Dec 19, 2015 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Dec 15, 2015 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Dec 14, 2015 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Dec 14, 2015 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Oct 2, 2015 | RFNP | REFUSAL PROCESSED BY IB | — |
| Sep 16, 2015 | RFCS | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED - REFUSAL SENT TO IB | — |
| Sep 16, 2015 | RFRR | REFUSAL PROCESSED BY MPU | — |
| Sep 16, 2015 | RFCR | NON-FINAL ACTION (IB REFUSAL) PREPARED FOR REVIEW | — |
| Sep 15, 2015 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Sep 12, 2015 | MAFR | APPLICATION FILING RECEIPT MAILED | — |
| Sep 8, 2015 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Sep 8, 2015 | NWOS | NEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED | — |
| Sep 3, 2015 | REPR | SN ASSIGNED FOR SECT 66A APPL FROM IB | — |