Drawing for LUX

USPTO serial 79172004

LUX

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 402
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
JUN, WON KYUNG WENDY
Law office
TMEG LAW OFFICE 103 - EXAMINING ATTORNEY ASSIGNED

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with LUX?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

Timothy J. Lyden

Timothy J. Lyden Hogan Lovells US LLP7930 Jones Branch Drive, 9th FloorMcLean, VA 22102UNITED STATES

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
012Bicycles excluding electrical bicycles; bicycle parts, namely, structural parts for bicycles, namely, bicycle frames excluding for electrical bicyclesSECTION 70 - CANCELLED—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Dec 18, 2025DENANOTIFICATION OF EFFECT OF CANCELLATION OF INTL REG E-MAILED—
Dec 18, 2025DETHDEATH OF INTERNATIONAL REGISTRATION—
Jan 11, 2019FINTFINAL DECISION TRANSACTION PROCESSED BY IB—
Dec 24, 2018FICSFINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE SENT TO IB—
Dec 22, 2018FICRFINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB—
Dec 22, 2017MAB2ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - FAILURE TO RESPONDThe trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time.
Dec 22, 2017ABN2ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSEThe trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time.
May 26, 2017GNRNNOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
May 26, 2017GNRTNON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
May 26, 2017CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
May 4, 2017RCCKSUSPENSION CHECKED - TO ATTORNEY FOR ACTION—
Mar 3, 2017OPNXNOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION - PROCESSED BY IB—
Feb 15, 2017OPNSNOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION SENT TO IB—
Feb 15, 2017OPNRNOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB—
Oct 21, 2016RCSCREPORT COMPLETED SUSPENSION CHECK CASE STILL SUSPENDED—
Oct 19, 2016ALIEASSIGNED TO LIE—
Apr 2, 2016GNS3NOTIFICATION OF LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED—
Apr 2, 2016GNSLLETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED—
Apr 2, 2016CNSLSUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN—
Mar 17, 2016TEMETEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED—
Mar 16, 2016CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Mar 16, 2016TROATEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Mar 15, 2016ARAAATTORNEY/DOM.REP.REVOKED AND/OR APPOINTEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Mar 15, 2016REAPTEAS REVOKE/APP/CHANGE ADDR OF ATTY/DOM REP RECEIVED—
Oct 9, 2015RFNTREFUSAL PROCESSED BY IB—
Sep 16, 2015RFCSNON-FINAL ACTION MAILED - REFUSAL SENT TO IB—
Sep 16, 2015RFRRREFUSAL PROCESSED BY MPU—
Sep 16, 2015RFCRNON-FINAL ACTION (IB REFUSAL) PREPARED FOR REVIEW—
Sep 15, 2015CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Sep 15, 2015MAFRAPPLICATION FILING RECEIPT MAILED—
Sep 14, 2015DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Sep 11, 2015NWOSNEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED—
Sep 10, 2015REPRSN ASSIGNED FOR SECT 66A APPL FROM IB—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance