Drawing for DIGIMANIA

USPTO serial 79172033

DIGIMANIA

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 402
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
SMITH, CYNTHIA RINALDI
Law office
TMEG LAW OFFICE 107 - EXAMINING ATTORNEY ASSIGNED

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with DIGIMANIA?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
009Animated films and videos; computer programs for use in computer graphics applications; computer programs featuring movie clips and art; sound and video recordings; software; video editing software; interactive and multi-media software; computer software relating to entertainment and animation; computer software for designing and creating 3D animation; computer software for creating and editing digital media contentsSECTION 70 - CANCELLED—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Oct 24, 2025DETHDEATH OF INTERNATIONAL REGISTRATION—
May 5, 2017FINTFINAL DECISION TRANSACTION PROCESSED BY IB—
Apr 14, 2017FICSFINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE SENT TO IB—
Apr 14, 2017FICRFINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB—
Mar 3, 2017OPNXNOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION - PROCESSED BY IB—
Feb 15, 2017OPNSNOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION SENT TO IB—
Feb 15, 2017OPNRNOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB—
Apr 14, 2016MAB2ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - FAILURE TO RESPONDThe trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time.
Apr 14, 2016ABN2ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSEThe trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time.
Dec 10, 2015ADCHCHANGE OF NAME/ADDRESS REC'D FROM IB—
Oct 9, 2015RFNTREFUSAL PROCESSED BY IB—
Sep 19, 2015MAFRAPPLICATION FILING RECEIPT MAILED—
Sep 17, 2015RFCSNON-FINAL ACTION MAILED - REFUSAL SENT TO IB—
Sep 17, 2015RFRRREFUSAL PROCESSED BY MPU—
Sep 17, 2015RFCRNON-FINAL ACTION (IB REFUSAL) PREPARED FOR REVIEW—
Sep 16, 2015CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Sep 15, 2015DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Sep 15, 2015NWOSNEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED—
Sep 11, 2015LIMILIMITATION FROM ORIGINAL APPLICATION ENTERED—
Sep 10, 2015REPRSN ASSIGNED FOR SECT 66A APPL FROM IB—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance