Drawing for IDEOCIAL

USPTO serial 79172092

IDEOCIAL

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 402
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
LAM, HAI-LY HUYNH
Law office
TTAB

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with IDEOCIAL?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

Brent E. Routman

BRENT E ROUTMAN MERCHANT & GOULD PCPO BOX 2910MINNEAPOLIS, MN 55402-0910UNITED STATES

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
009Computer software for use in change management or innovation management, namely, software that enables users to submit business concepts that allows in house corporate users to vote on and prioritize the submitted business conceptsABANDONED—
042Software as a service (SAAS) services featuring software for use in change management or innovation management, namely, software that enables users to submit business concepts that allows in house corporate users to vote on and prioritize the submitted business conceptsABANDONED—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Feb 19, 2026DENANOTIFICATION OF EFFECT OF CANCELLATION OF INTL REG E-MAILED—
Feb 19, 2026DETHDEATH OF INTERNATIONAL REGISTRATION—
Jan 2, 2021NREPNEW REPRESENTATIVE AT IB RECEIVED—
Sep 28, 2018FINTFINAL DECISION TRANSACTION PROCESSED BY IB—
Sep 5, 2018FICSFINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE SENT TO IB—
Sep 5, 2018FICRFINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB—
Sep 5, 2017MAB4ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - INTER PARTES DECISION—
Sep 5, 2017ABN4ABANDONMENT - AFTER INTER PARTES DECISION—
Sep 5, 2017OP.TOPPOSITION TERMINATED NO. 999999—
Sep 5, 2017OP.DOPPOSITION DISMISSED NO. 999999—
Jun 3, 2017RFNPREFUSAL PROCESSED BY IB—
May 1, 2017OP.IOPPOSITION INSTITUTED NO. 999999—
Apr 28, 2017OPNSOPPOSITION NOTICE (IB REFUSAL) SENT TO IB—
Apr 28, 2017OPNCOPPOSITION NOTICE (IB REFUSAL) CREATED—
Apr 27, 2017OPPFOPPOSITION PAPERS RECEIVED AT TTAB—
Mar 28, 2017NPUBOFFICIAL GAZETTE PUBLICATION CONFIRMATION E-MAILED—
Mar 28, 2017PUBOPUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITIONYour mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance.
Mar 25, 2017GPNXNOTIFICATION PROCESSED BY IB—
Mar 8, 2017OPNSNOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION SENT TO IB—
Mar 8, 2017OP2RNOTICE OF START OF OPPOSITION PERIOD CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB—
Mar 8, 2017NONPNOTIFICATION OF NOTICE OF PUBLICATION E-MAILED—
Mar 3, 2017OPNXNOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION - PROCESSED BY IB—
Feb 22, 2017PREVLAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED—
Feb 15, 2017OPNSNOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION SENT TO IB—
Feb 15, 2017OPNRNOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB—
Feb 13, 2017CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER—
Feb 10, 2017XAECEXAMINER'S AMENDMENT ENTERED—
Feb 10, 2017GNENNOTIFICATION OF EXAMINERS AMENDMENT E-MAILED—
Feb 10, 2017GNEAEXAMINERS AMENDMENT E-MAILED—
Feb 10, 2017CNEAEXAMINERS AMENDMENT -WRITTEN—
Jan 24, 2017TEMETEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED—
Jan 24, 2017CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Jan 24, 2017TROATEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Jan 12, 2017ARAAATTORNEY/DOM.REP.REVOKED AND/OR APPOINTEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Jan 12, 2017REAPTEAS REVOKE/APP/CHANGE ADDR OF ATTY/DOM REP RECEIVED—
Sep 19, 2016GNRNNOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Sep 19, 2016GNRTNON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Sep 19, 2016CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Aug 30, 2016RCCKSUSPENSION CHECKED - TO ATTORNEY FOR ACTION—
Aug 29, 2016ALIEASSIGNED TO LIE—
Jul 10, 2016ARAAATTORNEY/DOM.REP.REVOKED AND/OR APPOINTEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Jul 10, 2016REAPTEAS REVOKE/APP/CHANGE ADDR OF ATTY/DOM REP RECEIVED—
Jul 10, 2016ARAAATTORNEY/DOM.REP.REVOKED AND/OR APPOINTEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Jul 10, 2016REAPTEAS REVOKE/APP/CHANGE ADDR OF ATTY/DOM REP RECEIVED—
Feb 26, 2016NREPNEW REPRESENTATIVE AT IB RECEIVED—
Feb 18, 2016GNS3NOTIFICATION OF LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED—
Feb 18, 2016GNSLLETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED—
Feb 18, 2016CNSLSUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN—
Jan 28, 2016TEMETEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED—
Jan 27, 2016CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Jan 27, 2016TROATEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Dec 4, 2015RFNTREFUSAL PROCESSED BY IB—
Nov 16, 2015RFCSNON-FINAL ACTION MAILED - REFUSAL SENT TO IB—
Nov 16, 2015RFRRREFUSAL PROCESSED BY MPU—
Nov 13, 2015RFCRNON-FINAL ACTION (IB REFUSAL) PREPARED FOR REVIEW—
Nov 12, 2015CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Nov 10, 2015DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Sep 15, 2015MAFRAPPLICATION FILING RECEIPT MAILED—
Sep 11, 2015NWOSNEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED—
Sep 10, 2015REPRSN ASSIGNED FOR SECT 66A APPL FROM IB—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance