Drawing for MTK

USPTO serial 79172105

MTK

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 402
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
BENJAMIN, SARA NICOLE
Law office
TMO LAW OFFICE 110 - EXAMINING ATTORNEY ASSIGNED

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with MTK?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

William J. Seiter

William J. Seiter Seiter Legal Studio2500 Broadway, Bldg F, Suite F-125Santa Monica, CA 90404UNITED STATES

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
007Agricultural implements other than hand operated, namely, tractor towed agricultural attachments and apparatus and instruments for use in stability, load transfer and traction control and couplings therefor; parts and fittings for aforesaid, namely, rams, valves, shock absorbers and drawbarsSECTION 70 - CANCELLED—
009Computer software and computer apparatus used to control hydraulic systems for load transfer between agricultural vehicles and towed implements; computer software and computer apparatus for load transfer between agricultural vehicles and towed implements for automatically controlling load transfer between a tractor and a towed implement selected from: earth scrapers, seed drills, rippers, corn huskers, fertilizer distributors, harvesters, hay balers, manure spreaders, mowers, plows, reapers and rollers; component parts and fittings for the aforesaid; none of the aforementioned being for or in connection with boats, kayaks or water vehiclesSECTION 70 - CANCELLED—
012Load transfer apparatus for load transfer between tractors and towed implements selected from: earth scrapers, seed drills, rippers, corn huskers, fertilizer distributors, harvesters, hay balers, manure spreaders, mowers, plows, reapers and rollers in the nature of mechanisms for adjusting load transfer between the towed implement and the tractor to increase traction, and adjust ground engagement; component parts and fittings for the aforesaid; none of the aforementioned being for or in connection with boats, kayaks or water vehiclesSECTION 70 - CANCELLED—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Jun 27, 2025DENANOTIFICATION OF EFFECT OF CANCELLATION OF INTL REG E-MAILED—
Jun 27, 2025DETHDEATH OF INTERNATIONAL REGISTRATION—
Dec 8, 2017FINTFINAL DECISION TRANSACTION PROCESSED BY IB—
Nov 17, 2017FICSFINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE SENT TO IB—
Nov 17, 2017FICRFINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB—
Mar 3, 2017OPNXNOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION - PROCESSED BY IB—
Feb 15, 2017OPNSNOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION SENT TO IB—
Feb 15, 2017OPNRNOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB—
Nov 17, 2016MAB2ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - FAILURE TO RESPONDThe trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time.
Nov 17, 2016ABN2ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSEThe trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time.
Apr 21, 2016GNFNNOTIFICATION OF FINAL REFUSAL EMAILED—
Apr 21, 2016GNFRFINAL REFUSAL E-MAILEDA final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon.
Apr 21, 2016CNFRFINAL REFUSAL WRITTENA final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon.
Mar 31, 2016TEMETEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED—
Mar 31, 2016CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Mar 31, 2016ALIEASSIGNED TO LIE—
Mar 26, 2016TCCATEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED—
Mar 21, 2016TROATEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Oct 9, 2015RFNTREFUSAL PROCESSED BY IB—
Sep 22, 2015RFCSNON-FINAL ACTION MAILED - REFUSAL SENT TO IB—
Sep 21, 2015RFRRREFUSAL PROCESSED BY MPU—
Sep 19, 2015RFCRNON-FINAL ACTION (IB REFUSAL) PREPARED FOR REVIEW—
Sep 18, 2015CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Sep 15, 2015MAFRAPPLICATION FILING RECEIPT MAILED—
Sep 11, 2015DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Sep 11, 2015NWOSNEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED—
Sep 10, 2015REPRSN ASSIGNED FOR SECT 66A APPL FROM IB—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance