USPTO serial 79172220
DAYHR
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Status 402
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- YOUNG, THOMAS PAUL
- Law office
- TMO LAW OFFICE 120 - EXAMINING ATTORNEY ASSIGNED
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with DAYHR?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Goods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 042 | Computer programming; computer software design; updating of computer software; consultancy in the design and development of computer hardware; rental of computer software; maintenance of computer software; computer system analysis; computer system design services; duplication of computer programs; conversion of data or documents from physical to electronic media; creating and maintaining web sites for others; installation of computer software; data conversion of computer programs and data, not physical conversion; computer software consultancy; rental of web servers; providing search engines for obtaining data on the Internet | SECTION 70 - CANCELLED | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Jul 4, 2025 | DETH | DEATH OF INTERNATIONAL REGISTRATION | — |
| Nov 2, 2018 | FINT | FINAL DECISION TRANSACTION PROCESSED BY IB | — |
| Oct 16, 2018 | FICS | FINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE SENT TO IB | — |
| Oct 16, 2018 | FICR | FINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB | — |
| Oct 16, 2017 | MAB2 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - FAILURE TO RESPOND | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Oct 16, 2017 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Mar 20, 2017 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Mar 20, 2017 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Mar 17, 2017 | RCCK | SUSPENSION CHECKED - TO ATTORNEY FOR ACTION | — |
| Mar 3, 2017 | OPNX | NOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION - PROCESSED BY IB | — |
| Feb 15, 2017 | OPNS | NOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION SENT TO IB | — |
| Feb 15, 2017 | OPNR | NOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB | — |
| Nov 11, 2016 | RFNT | REFUSAL PROCESSED BY IB | — |
| Sep 16, 2016 | CNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Sep 15, 2016 | CNSL | SUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN | — |
| Sep 15, 2016 | CNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT MAILED | — |
| Sep 15, 2016 | XAEC | EXAMINER'S AMENDMENT ENTERED | — |
| Sep 15, 2016 | CNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT -WRITTEN | — |
| Sep 8, 2016 | NREP | NEW REPRESENTATIVE AT IB RECEIVED | — |
| Feb 18, 2016 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL MAILED | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Feb 18, 2016 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL WRITTEN | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Feb 16, 2016 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Feb 16, 2016 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Feb 8, 2016 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Feb 3, 2016 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Oct 2, 2015 | RFNT | REFUSAL PROCESSED BY IB | — |
| Sep 18, 2015 | MAFR | APPLICATION FILING RECEIPT MAILED | — |
| Sep 15, 2015 | RFCS | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED - REFUSAL SENT TO IB | — |
| Sep 15, 2015 | RFRR | REFUSAL PROCESSED BY MPU | — |
| Sep 15, 2015 | RFCR | NON-FINAL ACTION (IB REFUSAL) PREPARED FOR REVIEW | — |
| Sep 14, 2015 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Sep 14, 2015 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Sep 14, 2015 | NWOS | NEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED | — |
| Sep 10, 2015 | REPR | SN ASSIGNED FOR SECT 66A APPL FROM IB | — |