USPTO serial 79172388
3L TRIPLELOCK
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- Oct 4, 2016
- Examiner
- THOMAS, JULIE
- Law office
- GENERIC WEB UPDATE
What this means
This registration is in, or will soon enter, a USPTO maintenance window. Missing a Section 8 or Section 9 filing can cancel the registration.
Need help with 3L TRIPLELOCK?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Plus Government fees of $1,700
Owner
Innovations 4 Flooring Holding N.V.
CW
Other trademarks owned by Innovations 4 Flooring Holding N.V.
BE
Innovations 4 Flooring Holding N.V.
CW
Other trademarks owned by Innovations 4 Flooring Holding N.V.
Innovations 4 Flooring Holding N.V.
CW
Other trademarks owned by Innovations 4 Flooring Holding N.V.
Hamont-Achel, BE
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
John W. McIlvaine
John W. McIlvaine The Webb Law Firm420 Fort Duquesne Boulevard, Suite 1200One Gateway CenterPittsburgh, PA 15222Goods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 019 | [ non-metal building materials, namely, non-metal floor panels, tiles and boards, fascia, expansion joints for floors and walls; non-metallic transportable buildings; wooden floors, parquet flooring and laminated flooring and components of the aforesaid goods, namely, underlay for laminate flooring, waterproofing membranes for floors; floor panels, floorboards, parquet floor panels, parquet floor boards, laminate floor panels and laminate floor boards, all not of metal, whether or not involving a click system; wooden floor boards, floor parts in the nature of short strips or blocks of wood, skirting boards, moldings, profiles and transition profiles, movable floor panels and flooring underlayment in the nature of subfloors, all not of metal; panels and sheets, not of metal, including for covering floors, walls and ceilings; profiles for floors, architectural and decorative moldings and skirting boards, not of metal; non metallic flooring and wall connection systems comprising braces, joints and couplings, for floor panels, floorboards, parquet floor panels, parquet floor boards, laminate floor panels and laminate floor boards, non-metal connection joints in the nature of non-metal expansion joints for floors and walls; prepared wood; lumber; non-metal slabs for use in building, * being panels for sheets * not of textile material, whether or not provided with a click system; ] floor panels of vinyl | ACTIVE | — |
| 027 | [ linoleum for covering existing floors; wall coverings, not of textile material, whether or not provided with a click system; floating plastic floor coverings, whether or not involving a click system; floor coverings of vinyl; ] laminated floor coverings and laminated floor coverings of woven vinyl in combination with polyester | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
- Other trademarks owned by Innovations 4 Flooring Holding N.V.
- Other trademarks owned by I4F Licensing NV
- Other trademarks owned by Innovations 4 Flooring Holding N.V.
- Other trademarks owned by Innovations 4 Flooring Holding N.V.
- Other trademarks owned by I4F Licensing NV
- Other trademarks in Class 019
- Other trademarks in Class 027
- Similar marks named 3L TRIPLELOCK
- Recently changed USPTO trademarks
- Recently filed trademarks
- Browse all trademark records
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Jun 26, 2026 | TCCA | TEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED | — |
| Jun 26, 2026 | ECDR | TEAS CHANGE OF DOMESTIC REPRESENTATIVES ADDRESS | — |
| Jun 26, 2026 | ARAA | ATTORNEY/DOM.REP.REVOKED AND/OR APPOINTED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Jun 26, 2026 | REAP | TEAS REVOKE/APP/CHANGE ADDR OF ATTY/DOM REP RECEIVED | — |
| Jun 26, 2026 | CHAN | APPLICANT/CORRESPONDENCE CHANGES (NON-RESPONSIVE) ENTERED | — |
| Jun 26, 2026 | COAR | TEAS CHANGE OF OWNER ADDRESS RECEIVED | — |
| Oct 4, 2025 | REM4 | COURTESY REMINDER - SEC. 71 (10-YR) E-MAILED | — |
| Feb 7, 2025 | ADCH | CHANGE OF NAME/ADDRESS REC'D FROM IB | — |
| Feb 6, 2025 | RNWL | INTERNATIONAL REGISTRATION RENEWED | — |
| Oct 15, 2023 | NA75 | NOTICE OF ACCEPTANCE OF SEC. 71 & 15 - E-MAILED | — |
| Oct 15, 2023 | C75A | REGISTERED - SEC. 71 ACCEPTED & SEC. 15 ACK. | — |
| Oct 6, 2023 | EROP | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION-POST REG RECEIVED | — |
| Oct 5, 2023 | PUMI | PROOF OF USE INTERIM ACTION ISSUED | — |
| Sep 28, 2023 | EROP | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION-POST REG RECEIVED | — |
| Jul 18, 2023 | INNA | INVALIDATION REVIEWED - NO ACTION REQUIRED BY OFFICE | — |
| Jun 14, 2023 | INPR | PARTIAL INVALIDATION OF REG EXT PROTECTION CREATED | — |
| Mar 28, 2023 | PUM1 | OFFICE ACTION ISSUED POU1 | — |
| Mar 28, 2023 | APRE | CASE ASSIGNED TO POST REGISTRATION PARALEGAL | — |
| Nov 22, 2022 | NURC | NOTICE OF UPDATED REGISTRATION CONFIRMATION EMAILED | — |
| Oct 17, 2022 | LIME | LIMITATION FROM THE IB EXAMINED AND ENTERED | — |
| Oct 14, 2022 | COC. | CORRECTION UNDER SECTION 7 - PROCESSED | — |
| Oct 14, 2022 | PLGL | ASSIGNED TO PARALEGAL | — |
| Oct 11, 2022 | PUM1 | OFFICE ACTION ISSUED POU1 | — |
| Oct 10, 2022 | APRE | CASE ASSIGNED TO POST REGISTRATION PARALEGAL | — |
| Sep 12, 2022 | ES75 | TEAS SECTION 71 & 15 RECEIVED | — |
| Jun 4, 2022 | LIMG | LIMITATION OF GOODS RECEIVED FROM IB | — |
| Mar 19, 2022 | NREP | NEW REPRESENTATIVE AT IB RECEIVED | — |
| Oct 4, 2021 | REM3 | COURTESY REMINDER - SEC. 71 (6-YR) E-MAILED | — |
| Apr 30, 2021 | NREP | NEW REPRESENTATIVE AT IB RECEIVED | — |
| May 8, 2020 | CHLD | CHANGE OF OWNER RECEIVED FROM IB | — |
| Jan 3, 2020 | NREP | NEW REPRESENTATIVE AT IB RECEIVED | — |
| Feb 24, 2017 | FINO | FINAL DECISION TRANSACTION PROCESSED BY IB | — |
| Feb 8, 2017 | FICS | FINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE SENT TO IB | — |
| Feb 8, 2017 | FIMP | FINAL DISPOSITION PROCESSED | — |
| Jan 4, 2017 | FICR | FINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB | — |
| Dec 20, 2016 | ARAA | ATTORNEY/DOM.REP.REVOKED AND/OR APPOINTED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Dec 20, 2016 | REAP | TEAS REVOKE/APP/CHANGE ADDR OF ATTY/DOM REP RECEIVED | — |
| Dec 19, 2016 | TCCA | TEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED | — |
| Dec 9, 2016 | OPNX | NOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION - PROCESSED BY IB | — |
| Oct 4, 2016 | R.PR | REGISTERED-PRINCIPAL REGISTER | Your trademark is registered on the Principal Register — the strongest form of federal trademark protection. You may use the ® symbol for the covered goods and services. Maintenance filings (Section 8 and renewals) are required to keep the registration alive. |
| Jul 19, 2016 | NPUB | OFFICIAL GAZETTE PUBLICATION CONFIRMATION E-MAILED | — |
| Jul 19, 2016 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Jun 29, 2016 | OPNS | NOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION SENT TO IB | — |
| Jun 29, 2016 | OP2R | NOTICE OF START OF OPPOSITION PERIOD CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB | — |
| Jun 29, 2016 | NONP | NOTIFICATION OF NOTICE OF PUBLICATION E-MAILED | — |
| Jun 9, 2016 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Jun 9, 2016 | XAEC | EXAMINER'S AMENDMENT ENTERED | — |
| Jun 9, 2016 | GNEN | NOTIFICATION OF EXAMINERS AMENDMENT E-MAILED | — |
| Jun 9, 2016 | GNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT E-MAILED | — |
| Jun 9, 2016 | CNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT -WRITTEN | — |
| Jun 8, 2016 | ZZZX | PREVIOUS ALLOWANCE COUNT WITHDRAWN | — |
| May 10, 2016 | PBCR | WITHDRAWN FROM PUB - OG REVIEW QUERY | — |
| Apr 27, 2016 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Apr 27, 2016 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Apr 27, 2016 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Apr 27, 2016 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Apr 18, 2016 | GNRN | NOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Apr 18, 2016 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Apr 18, 2016 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Mar 17, 2016 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Mar 17, 2016 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Mar 17, 2016 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Oct 17, 2015 | RFNT | REFUSAL PROCESSED BY IB | — |
| Sep 28, 2015 | RFCS | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED - REFUSAL SENT TO IB | — |
| Sep 28, 2015 | RFRR | REFUSAL PROCESSED BY MPU | — |
| Sep 27, 2015 | RFCR | NON-FINAL ACTION (IB REFUSAL) PREPARED FOR REVIEW | — |
| Sep 26, 2015 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Sep 23, 2015 | MAFR | APPLICATION FILING RECEIPT MAILED | — |
| Sep 19, 2015 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Sep 19, 2015 | NWOS | NEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED | — |
| Sep 18, 2015 | LIMI | LIMITATION FROM ORIGINAL APPLICATION ENTERED | — |
| Sep 17, 2015 | REPR | SN ASSIGNED FOR SECT 66A APPL FROM IB | — |