Drawing for TRINK

USPTO serial 79172486

TRINK

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 402
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
MUCHA, JOHN EVAN
Law office
TMEG LAW OFFICE 106 - EXAMINING ATTORNEY ASSIGNED

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with TRINK?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
009Downloadable computer software applications for smartphones for taking and sharing pictures of drinks and beverages via the internetSECTION 70 - CANCELLED—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Oct 3, 2025DETHDEATH OF INTERNATIONAL REGISTRATION—
Dec 13, 2019NREPNEW REPRESENTATIVE AT IB RECEIVED—
Jul 14, 2017FINTFINAL DECISION TRANSACTION PROCESSED BY IB—
Jun 23, 2017FICSFINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE SENT TO IB—
Jun 23, 2017FICRFINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB—
Mar 10, 2017OPNXNOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION - PROCESSED BY IB—
Feb 22, 2017OPNSNOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION SENT TO IB—
Feb 22, 2017OPNRNOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB—
Jun 23, 2016MAB2ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - FAILURE TO RESPONDThe trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time.
Jun 23, 2016ABN2ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSEThe trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time.
Nov 25, 2015CNFRFINAL REFUSAL MAILEDA final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon.
Nov 24, 2015CNFRFINAL REFUSAL WRITTENA final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon.
Nov 3, 2015TEMETEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED—
Nov 3, 2015CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Nov 3, 2015TROATEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Nov 3, 2015FAXXFAX RECEIVED—
Oct 17, 2015RFNTREFUSAL PROCESSED BY IB—
Sep 25, 2015RFCSNON-FINAL ACTION MAILED - REFUSAL SENT TO IB—
Sep 25, 2015RFRRREFUSAL PROCESSED BY MPU—
Sep 25, 2015RFCRNON-FINAL ACTION (IB REFUSAL) PREPARED FOR REVIEW—
Sep 24, 2015CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Sep 22, 2015MAFRAPPLICATION FILING RECEIPT MAILED—
Sep 18, 2015DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Sep 18, 2015NWOSNEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED—
Sep 17, 2015REPRSN ASSIGNED FOR SECT 66A APPL FROM IB—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance