Drawing for SIESTA

USPTO serial 79172490

SIESTA

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 402
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
EISNACH, MICHAEL PATRICK
Law office
TMEG LAW OFFICE 104 - EXAMINING ATTORNEY ASSIGNED

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with SIESTA?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
031Natural plants and flowers of the genus Gazania; propagating material of natural plants and flowers of the genus Gazania, namely, cuttings and young plants of the genus GazaniaSECTION 70 - CANCELLED—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Jan 22, 2026DETHDEATH OF INTERNATIONAL REGISTRATION—
Dec 9, 2023NREPNEW REPRESENTATIVE AT IB RECEIVED—
Aug 27, 2021NREPNEW REPRESENTATIVE AT IB RECEIVED—
Dec 15, 2017NREPNEW REPRESENTATIVE AT IB RECEIVED—
Aug 18, 2017FINTFINAL DECISION TRANSACTION PROCESSED BY IB—
Aug 10, 2017CHLDCHANGE OF OWNER RECEIVED FROM IB—
May 25, 2017FICSFINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE SENT TO IB—
May 25, 2017FICRFINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB—
May 4, 2017CHLDCHANGE OF OWNER RECEIVED FROM IB—
Mar 10, 2017OPNXNOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION - PROCESSED BY IB—
Feb 22, 2017OPNSNOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION SENT TO IB—
Feb 22, 2017OPNRNOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB—
May 25, 2016MAB2ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - FAILURE TO RESPONDThe trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time.
May 25, 2016ABN2ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSEThe trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time.
Nov 17, 2015RFNTREFUSAL PROCESSED BY IB—
Oct 28, 2015RFCSNON-FINAL ACTION MAILED - REFUSAL SENT TO IB—
Oct 28, 2015RFRRREFUSAL PROCESSED BY MPU—
Oct 24, 2015RFCRNON-FINAL ACTION (IB REFUSAL) PREPARED FOR REVIEW—
Oct 23, 2015CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Oct 19, 2015DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Sep 23, 2015MAFRAPPLICATION FILING RECEIPT MAILED—
Sep 19, 2015NWOSNEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED—
Sep 18, 2015LIMILIMITATION FROM ORIGINAL APPLICATION ENTERED—
Sep 17, 2015REPRSN ASSIGNED FOR SECT 66A APPL FROM IB—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance