USPTO serial 79172658
VENTILUS
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Reg. 5139377Status 739Renewal
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- Feb 14, 2017
- Examiner
- TAYLOR, DAVID T
- Law office
- GENERIC WEB UPDATE
What this means
This registration is in, or will soon enter, a USPTO maintenance window. Missing a Section 8 or Section 9 filing can cancel the registration.
Need help with VENTILUS?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Get help with this Renewal, set up monitoring, or talk with CopyMark.
Get Attorney Assistance for just $748*
Plus Government fees of $1,300
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Pamela N. Hirschman
Pamela N. Hirschman Davis Graham & Stubbs LLP3400 Walnut Street, Suite 700Denver, CO 80205United StatesGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 007 | Machines for the pharmaceutical and food technology industry, namely, machines for coating, granulating, agglomerating and vortexing of pharmaceutical or chemical products and food; machines, namely, fluidized bed apparatus, namely, industrial fluidized bed reactors and structural parts thereof; machine parts, namely, spray nozzles which are parts of power-operated spray equipment for spraying of multiple substances, namely, liquids, gases and pulverized dry substances | ACTIVE | — |
| 011 | Drying apparatuses and installations for chemical processing in the pharmaceutical and food technology industry for drying of pharmaceutical products and food; drying apparatus for chemical processing for drying of pharmaceutical or chemical products and food | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
- Other trademarks owned by Romaco Innojet GmbH
- Other trademarks owned by Romaco Innojet GmbH
- Other trademarks owned by Romaco Innojet GmbH
- Other trademarks in Class 007
- Other trademarks in Class 011
- Similar marks named VENTILUS
- Recently changed USPTO trademarks
- Recently filed trademarks
- Browse all trademark records
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Feb 15, 2026 | REM4 | COURTESY REMINDER - SEC. 71 (10-YR) E-MAILED | — |
| Apr 3, 2025 | RNWL | INTERNATIONAL REGISTRATION RENEWED | — |
| Nov 17, 2024 | TCCA | TEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED | — |
| Nov 17, 2024 | ARAA | ATTORNEY/DOM.REP.REVOKED AND/OR APPOINTED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Nov 17, 2024 | REAP | TEAS REVOKE/APP/CHANGE ADDR OF ATTY/DOM REP RECEIVED | — |
| Aug 13, 2023 | NA75 | NOTICE OF ACCEPTANCE OF SEC. 71 & 15 - E-MAILED | — |
| Aug 12, 2023 | C75A | REGISTERED - SEC. 71 ACCEPTED & SEC. 15 ACK. | — |
| Aug 11, 2023 | APRE | CASE ASSIGNED TO POST REGISTRATION PARALEGAL | — |
| Jan 25, 2023 | ES75 | TEAS SECTION 71 & 15 RECEIVED | — |
| Feb 14, 2022 | REM3 | COURTESY REMINDER - SEC. 71 (6-YR) E-MAILED | — |
| Jun 9, 2017 | OPNX | NOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION - PROCESSED BY IB | — |
| Jun 3, 2017 | FINO | FINAL DECISION TRANSACTION PROCESSED BY IB | — |
| May 15, 2017 | FICS | FINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE SENT TO IB | — |
| May 15, 2017 | FIMP | FINAL DISPOSITION PROCESSED | — |
| May 14, 2017 | FICR | FINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB | — |
| Feb 14, 2017 | R.PR | REGISTERED-PRINCIPAL REGISTER | Your trademark is registered on the Principal Register — the strongest form of federal trademark protection. You may use the ® symbol for the covered goods and services. Maintenance filings (Section 8 and renewals) are required to keep the registration alive. |
| Nov 29, 2016 | NPUB | OFFICIAL GAZETTE PUBLICATION CONFIRMATION E-MAILED | — |
| Nov 29, 2016 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Nov 9, 2016 | OPNS | NOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION SENT TO IB | — |
| Nov 9, 2016 | OP2R | NOTICE OF START OF OPPOSITION PERIOD CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB | — |
| Nov 9, 2016 | NONP | NOTIFICATION OF NOTICE OF PUBLICATION E-MAILED | — |
| Oct 27, 2016 | PREV | LAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED | — |
| Oct 17, 2016 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Sep 3, 2016 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Sep 2, 2016 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Sep 2, 2016 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Apr 28, 2016 | GNRN | NOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Apr 28, 2016 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Apr 28, 2016 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Apr 4, 2016 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Apr 4, 2016 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Mar 30, 2016 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Mar 17, 2016 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Oct 9, 2015 | RFNT | REFUSAL PROCESSED BY IB | — |
| Sep 22, 2015 | RFCS | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED - REFUSAL SENT TO IB | — |
| Sep 22, 2015 | MAFR | APPLICATION FILING RECEIPT MAILED | — |
| Sep 21, 2015 | RFRR | REFUSAL PROCESSED BY MPU | — |
| Sep 19, 2015 | RFCR | NON-FINAL ACTION (IB REFUSAL) PREPARED FOR REVIEW | — |
| Sep 18, 2015 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Sep 18, 2015 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Sep 18, 2015 | NWOS | NEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED | — |
| Sep 17, 2015 | REPR | SN ASSIGNED FOR SECT 66A APPL FROM IB | — |