USPTO serial 79172670
GUIDANCE AUTOMATION
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Reg. 5093272Status 739Renewal
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- Dec 6, 2016
- Examiner
- GLASSER, CARYN
- Law office
- GENERIC WEB UPDATE
What this means
This registration is in, or will soon enter, a USPTO maintenance window. Missing a Section 8 or Section 9 filing can cancel the registration.
Need help with GUIDANCE AUTOMATION?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Get help with this Renewal, set up monitoring, or talk with CopyMark.
Get Attorney Assistance for just $399*
Plus Government fees of $650
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Lisel M. Ferguson
Lisel M. Ferguson Procopio, Cory, Hargreaves & Savitch LLP525 B Street, Suite 2200San Diego, CA 92101UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 009 | Position reference systems comprised of software, hardware, cameras, lasers, radio-frequency identification (RFID) apparatus, sensors for determining positions and beacons for use in directing the motion, stopping and loading points for autonomous robotic vehicles, such as those used in warehouses, so that they may navigate around shelving and racking and other objects, collect specific goods from specific shelves or places, load them into a temporary container or storage device and deposit them at a defined point for onward distribution; satellite-aided navigation systems; location tracking systems comprised of software, hardware, cameras, lasers, radio-frequency identification (RFID) apparatus, sensors for determining positions and beacons for use in directing the motion, stopping and loading points for autonomous robotic vehicles, such as those used in warehouses, so that they may navigate around shelving and racking and other objects, collect specific goods from specific shelves or places, load them into a temporary container or storage device and deposit them at a defined point for onward distribution for use in tracking autonomous robotic vehicles within environments such as warehouses and storage areas; position reference systems, navigation systems and location tracking systems comprised of laser, vision, magnetic, electromagnetic and RFID (radio frequency identification) based position reference sensors for use with vehicles; position reference systems, navigation systems and location tracking systems incorporating laser, vision, magnetic, electromagnetic and RFID (radio frequency identification) based position reference sensors, reference targets or natural feature recognition, computer hardware and computer software for use in receiving and analyzing digital data; laser, vision, magnetic, electromagnetic and RFID (radio frequency identification) based position reference sensors for use with control applications; collision avoidance systems comprised of sensors for determining positions and distance; collision avoidance systems comprised of laser, vision, magnetic, electromagnetic and RFID (radio frequency identification) based position reference sensors; collision avoidance systems comprised of laser, vision, magnetic, electromagnetic and RFID (radio frequency identification) based position reference sensors, reference targets or natural feature recognition, computer hardware and computer software for collecting and analyzing digital data; proximity sensors for automated guide vehicles; software for mapping the environment of automated guide vehicles; software for creating digital maps for use by automated guide vehicles; structural parts and fittings for all the aforesaid goods | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
- Other trademarks owned by Guidance Automation Ltd.
- Other trademarks owned by Guidance Automation Ltd.
- Other trademarks owned by Guidance Automation Ltd.
- Other trademarks in Class 009
- Similar marks named GUIDANCE AUTOMATION
- Recently changed USPTO trademarks
- Recently filed trademarks
- Browse all trademark records
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Dec 6, 2025 | REM4 | COURTESY REMINDER - SEC. 71 (10-YR) E-MAILED | — |
| Oct 9, 2025 | NREP | NEW REPRESENTATIVE AT IB RECEIVED | — |
| Jun 19, 2025 | RNWL | INTERNATIONAL REGISTRATION RENEWED | — |
| Feb 21, 2025 | NREP | NEW REPRESENTATIVE AT IB RECEIVED | — |
| Feb 7, 2025 | NREP | NEW REPRESENTATIVE AT IB RECEIVED | — |
| May 5, 2023 | NREP | NEW REPRESENTATIVE AT IB RECEIVED | — |
| Nov 26, 2022 | NA75 | NOTICE OF ACCEPTANCE OF SEC. 71 & 15 - E-MAILED | — |
| Nov 26, 2022 | C75A | REGISTERED - SEC. 71 ACCEPTED & SEC. 15 ACK. | — |
| Nov 22, 2022 | APRE | CASE ASSIGNED TO POST REGISTRATION PARALEGAL | — |
| Jun 3, 2022 | ES75 | TEAS SECTION 71 & 15 RECEIVED | — |
| Dec 6, 2021 | REM3 | COURTESY REMINDER - SEC. 71 (6-YR) E-MAILED | — |
| Mar 15, 2018 | NREP | NEW REPRESENTATIVE AT IB RECEIVED | — |
| Apr 1, 2017 | FINO | FINAL DECISION TRANSACTION PROCESSED BY IB | — |
| Mar 10, 2017 | FICS | FINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE SENT TO IB | — |
| Mar 10, 2017 | FIMP | FINAL DISPOSITION PROCESSED | — |
| Mar 6, 2017 | FICR | FINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB | — |
| Dec 23, 2016 | OPNX | NOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION - PROCESSED BY IB | — |
| Dec 6, 2016 | R.PR | REGISTERED-PRINCIPAL REGISTER | Your trademark is registered on the Principal Register — the strongest form of federal trademark protection. You may use the ® symbol for the covered goods and services. Maintenance filings (Section 8 and renewals) are required to keep the registration alive. |
| Sep 20, 2016 | NPUB | OFFICIAL GAZETTE PUBLICATION CONFIRMATION E-MAILED | — |
| Sep 20, 2016 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Aug 31, 2016 | OPNS | NOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION SENT TO IB | — |
| Aug 31, 2016 | OP2R | NOTICE OF START OF OPPOSITION PERIOD CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB | — |
| Aug 31, 2016 | NONP | NOTIFICATION OF NOTICE OF PUBLICATION E-MAILED | — |
| Aug 17, 2016 | PREV | LAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED | — |
| Aug 8, 2016 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Aug 8, 2016 | XAEC | EXAMINER'S AMENDMENT ENTERED | — |
| Aug 8, 2016 | GRML | CORRESPONDENCE E-MAILED | — |
| Aug 8, 2016 | CNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT -WRITTEN | — |
| Aug 8, 2016 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Aug 8, 2016 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Aug 8, 2016 | ERFR | TEAS REQUEST FOR RECONSIDERATION RECEIVED | — |
| Jun 6, 2016 | GNFN | NOTIFICATION OF FINAL REFUSAL EMAILED | — |
| Jun 6, 2016 | GNFR | FINAL REFUSAL E-MAILED | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Jun 6, 2016 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL WRITTEN | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| May 19, 2016 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| May 19, 2016 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| May 13, 2016 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| May 3, 2016 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| May 3, 2016 | ARAA | ATTORNEY/DOM.REP.REVOKED AND/OR APPOINTED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| May 3, 2016 | REAP | TEAS REVOKE/APP/CHANGE ADDR OF ATTY/DOM REP RECEIVED | — |
| Nov 20, 2015 | RFNT | REFUSAL PROCESSED BY IB | — |
| Nov 3, 2015 | RFCS | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED - REFUSAL SENT TO IB | — |
| Nov 3, 2015 | RFRR | REFUSAL PROCESSED BY MPU | — |
| Oct 30, 2015 | RFCR | NON-FINAL ACTION (IB REFUSAL) PREPARED FOR REVIEW | — |
| Oct 29, 2015 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Oct 27, 2015 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Sep 22, 2015 | MAFR | APPLICATION FILING RECEIPT MAILED | — |
| Sep 18, 2015 | NWOS | NEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED | — |
| Sep 17, 2015 | REPR | SN ASSIGNED FOR SECT 66A APPL FROM IB | — |