USPTO serial 79172744
ELEVIDA
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Reg. 5126177Status 709
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- Jan 24, 2017
- Examiner
- BROOKSHIRE, DAVID AARON
- Law office
- PUBLICATION AND ISSUE SECTION
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with ELEVIDA?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Goods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 009 | Computer software programs for performing automated symptom checklists used for the diagnosis and treatment of fatigue; computer software programs for searching data bases of medical information and content, accessing medical information and medical content; computer software programs for the organizing, accessing and searching scientific content; computer programs, in particular computerised interactive software to evaluate and diagnose medical illnesses used by patients and specialized medical personnel in the field of Fatigue | SECTION 71 - CANCELLED | — |
| 041 | Providing of training and further education in the form of live and online classes in the field of Fatigue for users in medical fields with the aid of software; entertainment, namely a continuing program about accessible ways and solutions to handle Fatigue by means of a dialogue supported communication system, namely corresponding medical online courses; further education of patients and specialized medical personnel the form of personal medical coaching, via phone and online, in the field of Fatigue | SECTION 71 - CANCELLED | — |
| 042 | Creating and developing computer programs for semantic linking and presentation of scientific data and for dialogue management; creation of computer programs, also including artificial intelligence; technical research, namely, medical research and software development research in the field of Fatigue | SECTION 71 - CANCELLED | — |
| 044 | Computerized interactive support for patients and specialized medical personnel in the field of Fatigue, namely medical coaching and medical services in the field of Fatigue by means of a dialogue supported communication system | SECTION 71 - CANCELLED | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
- Other trademarks owned by GAIA AG
- Other trademarks owned by GAIA AG
- Other trademarks owned by GAIA AG
- Other trademarks in Class 009
- Other trademarks in Class 041
- Other trademarks in Class 042
- Other trademarks in Class 044
- Similar marks named ELEVIDA
- Recently changed USPTO trademarks
- Recently filed trademarks
- Browse all trademark records
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| May 31, 2025 | Further Decision Processed by IB | — | |
| Apr 16, 2025 | XXSS | GENERIC MADRID TRANSACTION SENT TO IB | — |
| Apr 16, 2025 | INNA | INVALIDATION REVIEWED - NO ACTION REQUIRED BY OFFICE | — |
| Apr 16, 2025 | XXCR | GENERIC MADRID TRANSACTION CREATED | — |
| Apr 4, 2024 | INTR | TOTAL INVALIDATION OF REG EXT PROTECTION CREATED | — |
| Aug 4, 2023 | C71T | CANCELLED SECTION 71 | — |
| Jul 24, 2023 | RNWL | INTERNATIONAL REGISTRATION RENEWED | — |
| Sep 6, 2019 | ADCH | CHANGE OF NAME/ADDRESS REC'D FROM IB | — |
| Aug 11, 2017 | FINO | FINAL DECISION TRANSACTION PROCESSED BY IB | — |
| Jun 9, 2017 | OPNX | NOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION - PROCESSED BY IB | — |
| Apr 25, 2017 | FICS | FINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE SENT TO IB | — |
| Apr 25, 2017 | FIMP | FINAL DISPOSITION PROCESSED | — |
| Apr 24, 2017 | FICR | FINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB | — |
| Jan 24, 2017 | R.PR | REGISTERED-PRINCIPAL REGISTER | Your trademark is registered on the Principal Register — the strongest form of federal trademark protection. You may use the ® symbol for the covered goods and services. Maintenance filings (Section 8 and renewals) are required to keep the registration alive. |
| Nov 8, 2016 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Oct 19, 2016 | OPNS | NOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION SENT TO IB | — |
| Oct 19, 2016 | OP2R | NOTICE OF START OF OPPOSITION PERIOD CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB | — |
| Oct 19, 2016 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Sep 29, 2016 | CNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT MAILED | — |
| Sep 28, 2016 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Sep 28, 2016 | XAEC | EXAMINER'S AMENDMENT ENTERED | — |
| Sep 28, 2016 | CNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT -WRITTEN | — |
| Mar 2, 2016 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL MAILED | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Mar 1, 2016 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL WRITTEN | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Feb 9, 2016 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Feb 9, 2016 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Feb 9, 2016 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Jan 27, 2016 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jan 25, 2016 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jan 6, 2016 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Jan 6, 2016 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jan 6, 2016 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Jan 6, 2016 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Oct 17, 2015 | RFNT | REFUSAL PROCESSED BY IB | — |
| Sep 22, 2015 | RFCS | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED - REFUSAL SENT TO IB | — |
| Sep 22, 2015 | MAFR | APPLICATION FILING RECEIPT MAILED | — |
| Sep 21, 2015 | RFRR | REFUSAL PROCESSED BY MPU | — |
| Sep 19, 2015 | RFCR | NON-FINAL ACTION (IB REFUSAL) PREPARED FOR REVIEW | — |
| Sep 18, 2015 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Sep 18, 2015 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Sep 18, 2015 | NWOS | NEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED | — |
| Sep 17, 2015 | SDRC | SN ASSIGNED FOR SECT 66A SUBSEQ DESIG FROM IB | — |