Drawing for TILLER

USPTO serial 79172913

TILLER

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Reg. 5097705Status 739Renewal
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
Dec 13, 2016
Examiner
DUBRAY, KATHERINE M
Law office
GENERIC WEB UPDATE

What this means

This registration is in, or will soon enter, a USPTO maintenance window. Missing a Section 8 or Section 9 filing can cancel the registration.

Need help with TILLER?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Get help with this Renewal, set up monitoring, or talk with CopyMark.
Get Attorney Assistance for just $399*

Plus Government fees of $650

Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

Michael C. Cerrati

Michael C. Cerrati Belzer PC2905 Bull StreetSavannah, GA 31405UNITED STATES

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
007Machines and machine tools, namely, mechanical and [ hydraulic lifts, lifting jacks other than hand-operated, hydraulic lift tables, driving devices for lifts, ] and metal parts and fittings for power-operated lifting equipmentACTIVE—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Dec 13, 2025REM4COURTESY REMINDER - SEC. 71 (10-YR) E-MAILED—
Jan 30, 2025RNWLINTERNATIONAL REGISTRATION RENEWED—
May 6, 2023NA75NOTICE OF ACCEPTANCE OF SEC. 71 & 15 - E-MAILED—
May 6, 2023C75AREGISTERED - SEC. 71 ACCEPTED & SEC. 15 ACK.—
May 2, 2023APRECASE ASSIGNED TO POST REGISTRATION PARALEGAL—
Oct 18, 2022ES75TEAS SECTION 71 & 15 RECEIVED—
Dec 12, 2019NREPNEW REPRESENTATIVE AT IB RECEIVED—
Apr 1, 2017FINOFINAL DECISION TRANSACTION PROCESSED BY IB—
Mar 15, 2017FICSFINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE SENT TO IB—
Mar 15, 2017FIMPFINAL DISPOSITION PROCESSED—
Mar 13, 2017FICRFINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB—
Mar 3, 2017OPNXNOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION - PROCESSED BY IB—
Dec 13, 2016R.PRREGISTERED-PRINCIPAL REGISTERYour trademark is registered on the Principal Register — the strongest form of federal trademark protection. You may use the ® symbol for the covered goods and services. Maintenance filings (Section 8 and renewals) are required to keep the registration alive.
Sep 27, 2016PUBOPUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITIONYour mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance.
Sep 7, 2016OPNSNOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION SENT TO IB—
Sep 7, 2016OP2RNOTICE OF START OF OPPOSITION PERIOD CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB—
Sep 7, 2016NPUBNOTICE OF PUBLICATION—
Aug 19, 2016PREVLAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED—
Aug 12, 2016CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER—
Aug 12, 2016CNEAEXAMINERS AMENDMENT MAILED—
Aug 12, 2016XAECEXAMINER'S AMENDMENT ENTERED—
Aug 12, 2016CNEAEXAMINERS AMENDMENT -WRITTEN—
Jul 27, 2016NREVNOTICE OF REVIVAL - MAILED—
Jul 27, 2016TEMETEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED—
Jul 27, 2016CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Jul 27, 2016ALIEASSIGNED TO LIE—
Jul 27, 2016PGRRPETITION GRANTED - RESPONSE RECEIVED—
Jul 21, 2016ERTPTEAS RESPONSE TO PETITION DEFICIENCY RECEIVED—
Jun 21, 2016PINMINCOMPLETE PETITION NOTICE MAILED—
Jun 16, 2016APETASSIGNED TO PETITION STAFF—
May 25, 2016PETRPETITION TO REVIVE-RECEIVED—
May 25, 2016FAXXFAX RECEIVED—
May 10, 2016MAB2ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - FAILURE TO RESPONDThe trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time.
May 10, 2016ABN2ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSEThe trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time.
Oct 30, 2015RFNTREFUSAL PROCESSED BY IB—
Oct 9, 2015RFCSNON-FINAL ACTION MAILED - REFUSAL SENT TO IB—
Oct 9, 2015RFRRREFUSAL PROCESSED BY MPU—
Oct 9, 2015RFCRNON-FINAL ACTION (IB REFUSAL) PREPARED FOR REVIEW—
Oct 8, 2015CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Oct 2, 2015MAFRAPPLICATION FILING RECEIPT MAILED—
Sep 30, 2015DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Sep 28, 2015NWOSNEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED—
Sep 24, 2015REPRSN ASSIGNED FOR SECT 66A APPL FROM IB—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance