USPTO serial 79172923
NEKO
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Status 402
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- MITTLER, ROBIN M
- Law office
- TMO LAW OFFICE 119 - EXAMINING ATTORNEY ASSIGNED
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with NEKO?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Kimberley Cunningham
Kimberley Cunningham Bennett Jones LLP3200 TELUS HOUSE, 10020 - 100 StreetEdmonton, AB, T5J0N3CANADAGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 009 | Electric light dimmers, covers specially designed for electric outlets, lighting ballasts, stage lighting regulators, namely, electric light dimmers and electric light switches, electrical inductors, infrared optical sensors, electric transformers, junction boxes, clamps, namely, battery terminal connector clamps all voltage stabilizers, all aforesaid goods being for installation in residences, buildings and offices | SECTION 70 - CANCELLED | — |
| 011 | Electric lamps, lamps for lighting, lamp mantles, lamp glasses, light diffusers, lighting apparatus, namely, lighting installations, chandeliers, ceiling lights, lamp globes, lamp reflectors, luminous lighting tubes, lampshades, lampshade holders, aquarium lights and light-emitting diode (LED) lighting apparatus, namely, lighting installations, all aforesaid goods being for installation in residences, buildings and offices | SECTION 70 - CANCELLED | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Jan 22, 2026 | DENA | NOTIFICATION OF EFFECT OF CANCELLATION OF INTL REG E-MAILED | — |
| Jan 22, 2026 | DETH | DEATH OF INTERNATIONAL REGISTRATION | — |
| Aug 1, 2025 | NREP | NEW REPRESENTATIVE AT IB RECEIVED | — |
| Jan 26, 2018 | FINT | FINAL DECISION TRANSACTION PROCESSED BY IB | — |
| Jan 11, 2018 | FICS | FINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE SENT TO IB | — |
| Jan 11, 2018 | FICR | FINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB | — |
| Mar 17, 2017 | OPNX | NOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION - PROCESSED BY IB | — |
| Mar 1, 2017 | OPNS | NOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION SENT TO IB | — |
| Mar 1, 2017 | OPNR | NOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB | — |
| Jan 11, 2017 | MAB2 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - FAILURE TO RESPOND | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Jan 11, 2017 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Sep 26, 2016 | ARAA | ATTORNEY/DOM.REP.REVOKED AND/OR APPOINTED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Sep 26, 2016 | REAP | TEAS REVOKE/APP/CHANGE ADDR OF ATTY/DOM REP RECEIVED | — |
| Sep 1, 2016 | ADCH | CHANGE OF NAME/ADDRESS REC'D FROM IB | — |
| Sep 1, 2016 | NREP | NEW REPRESENTATIVE AT IB RECEIVED | — |
| Jul 14, 2016 | NREP | NEW REPRESENTATIVE AT IB RECEIVED | — |
| Jun 15, 2016 | GNFN | NOTIFICATION OF FINAL REFUSAL EMAILED | — |
| Jun 15, 2016 | GNFR | FINAL REFUSAL E-MAILED | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Jun 15, 2016 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL WRITTEN | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Apr 23, 2016 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Apr 22, 2016 | ARAA | ATTORNEY/DOM.REP.REVOKED AND/OR APPOINTED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Apr 22, 2016 | REAP | TEAS REVOKE/APP/CHANGE ADDR OF ATTY/DOM REP RECEIVED | — |
| Apr 22, 2016 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Apr 22, 2016 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Nov 17, 2015 | RFNT | REFUSAL PROCESSED BY IB | — |
| Oct 28, 2015 | RFCS | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED - REFUSAL SENT TO IB | — |
| Oct 28, 2015 | RFRR | REFUSAL PROCESSED BY MPU | — |
| Oct 23, 2015 | RFCR | NON-FINAL ACTION (IB REFUSAL) PREPARED FOR REVIEW | — |
| Oct 22, 2015 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Oct 15, 2015 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Oct 2, 2015 | MAFR | APPLICATION FILING RECEIPT MAILED | — |
| Sep 28, 2015 | NWOS | NEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED | — |
| Sep 24, 2015 | REPR | SN ASSIGNED FOR SECT 66A APPL FROM IB | — |