Drawing for ROSA GRES

USPTO serial 79173004

ROSA GRES

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 402
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
ALESKOW, DAVID HOWARD
Law office
TMEG LAW OFFICE 105 - EXAMINING ATTORNEY ASSIGNED

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with ROSA GRES?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
019Non-metallic building materials, namely, for walls, for pavement and for decoration; porcelain stoneware, namely, wall coverings, border tiles, skirtings, corner caps, step tiles, handrail tiles, channel tiles; swimming pool decking, namely, coating tiles; pavement pieces for swimming pool perimeters, namely, tiles, channelsSECTION 70 - CANCELLED—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Dec 18, 2025DENANOTIFICATION OF EFFECT OF CANCELLATION OF INTL REG E-MAILED—
Dec 18, 2025DETHDEATH OF INTERNATIONAL REGISTRATION—
Nov 30, 2021NREPNEW REPRESENTATIVE AT IB RECEIVED—
Dec 21, 2019CHLDCHANGE OF OWNER RECEIVED FROM IB—
Aug 4, 2017FINTFINAL DECISION TRANSACTION PROCESSED BY IB—
Jun 9, 2017OPNXNOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION - PROCESSED BY IB—
May 15, 2017FICSFINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE SENT TO IB—
May 13, 2017FICRFINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB—
Mar 1, 2017OPNSNOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION SENT TO IB—
Mar 1, 2017OPNRNOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB—
May 13, 2016MAB2ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - FAILURE TO RESPONDThe trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time.
May 13, 2016ABN2ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSEThe trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time.
May 2, 2016ARAAATTORNEY/DOM.REP.REVOKED AND/OR APPOINTEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
May 2, 2016REAPTEAS REVOKE/APP/CHANGE ADDR OF ATTY/DOM REP RECEIVED—
May 2, 2016TCCATEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED—
Feb 5, 2016MREINOTICE OF REINSTATEMENT MAILED—
Feb 2, 2016REINREINSTATED—
Dec 19, 2015DENANOTIFICATION OF EFFECT OF CANCELLATION OF INTL REG MAILED—
Dec 18, 2015DETHDEATH OF INTERNATIONAL REGISTRATION—
Nov 8, 2015RFNTREFUSAL PROCESSED BY IB—
Oct 16, 2015RFCSNON-FINAL ACTION MAILED - REFUSAL SENT TO IB—
Oct 16, 2015RFRRREFUSAL PROCESSED BY MPU—
Oct 14, 2015RFCRNON-FINAL ACTION (IB REFUSAL) PREPARED FOR REVIEW—
Oct 13, 2015CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Oct 3, 2015MAFRAPPLICATION FILING RECEIPT MAILED—
Sep 29, 2015DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Sep 29, 2015NWOSNEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED—
Sep 25, 2015LIMILIMITATION FROM ORIGINAL APPLICATION ENTERED—
Sep 24, 2015SDRCSN ASSIGNED FOR SECT 66A SUBSEQ DESIG FROM IB—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance