Drawing for PERFECTFIT BY DAMART

USPTO serial 79173033

PERFECTFIT BY DAMART

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 402
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
Examiner
BULLOFF, TOBY ELLEN
Law office
GENERIC WEB UPDATE

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with PERFECTFIT BY DAMART?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

Douglas R. Wolf

Douglas R. Wolf Wolf, Greenfield & Sacks, P.C.600 Atlantic AvenueBoston, MA 02210UNITED STATES

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
016Catalogs in the field of fashionABANDONED
025Clothing, namely, pants, shorts, skirts, dresses, leggings, trousers, bottoms; clothing of leather, namely, pants, shorts, skirts, dresses, leggings, trousers, bottoms; clothing of imitation leather, namely, pants, shorts, skirts, dresses, leggings, trousers, bottoms; pajamas; clothing for gymnastics, namely, thermolactyl pants, microfleece pants, thermal pantsABANDONED

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Oct 31, 2023DENANOTIFICATION OF EFFECT OF CANCELLATION OF INTL REG E-MAILED
Oct 30, 2023DETHDEATH OF INTERNATIONAL REGISTRATION
Jul 9, 2022ADCHCHANGE OF NAME/ADDRESS REC'D FROM IB
Aug 3, 2018FINTFINAL DECISION TRANSACTION PROCESSED BY IB
Jul 19, 2018ADCHCHANGE OF NAME/ADDRESS REC'D FROM IB
Jul 11, 2018FICSFINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE SENT TO IB
Jul 11, 2018FICRFINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB
Aug 3, 2017NREPNEW REPRESENTATIVE AT IB RECEIVED
Jul 11, 2017MAB5ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - AFTER PUBLICATION
Jul 11, 2017ABN5ABANDONMENT - AFTER PUBLICATION
Jul 7, 2017EXARTEAS EXPRESS ABANDONMENT RECEIVED
May 16, 2017ETOFEXTENSION OF TIME TO OPPOSE RECEIVED
Apr 18, 2017NPUBOFFICIAL GAZETTE PUBLICATION CONFIRMATION E-MAILED
Apr 18, 2017PUBOPUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITIONYour mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance.
Mar 29, 2017OPNSNOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION SENT TO IB
Mar 29, 2017OP2RNOTICE OF START OF OPPOSITION PERIOD CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB
Mar 29, 2017NONPNOTIFICATION OF NOTICE OF PUBLICATION E-MAILED
Mar 17, 2017OPNXNOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION - PROCESSED BY IB
Mar 10, 2017PREVLAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED
Mar 6, 2017CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER
Mar 1, 2017OPNSNOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION SENT TO IB
Mar 1, 2017OPNRNOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB
Feb 14, 2017RCCKSUSPENSION CHECKED - TO ATTORNEY FOR ACTION
Feb 9, 2017DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER
Jul 23, 2016GNS3NOTIFICATION OF LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED
Jul 23, 2016GNSLLETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED
Jul 23, 2016CNSLSUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN
May 25, 2016TEMETEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED
May 25, 2016CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE
May 17, 2016ALIEASSIGNED TO LIE
May 4, 2016TROATEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Feb 1, 2016ARAAATTORNEY/DOM.REP.REVOKED AND/OR APPOINTEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Feb 1, 2016REAPTEAS REVOKE/APP/CHANGE ADDR OF ATTY/DOM REP RECEIVED
Nov 20, 2015RFNTREFUSAL PROCESSED BY IB
Nov 5, 2015RFCSNON-FINAL ACTION MAILED - REFUSAL SENT TO IB
Nov 5, 2015RFRRREFUSAL PROCESSED BY MPU
Nov 5, 2015RFCRNON-FINAL ACTION (IB REFUSAL) PREPARED FOR REVIEW
Nov 4, 2015CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Oct 15, 2015DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER
Oct 3, 2015MAFRAPPLICATION FILING RECEIPT MAILED
Sep 29, 2015NWOSNEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED
Sep 24, 2015SDRCSN ASSIGNED FOR SECT 66A SUBSEQ DESIG FROM IB

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance