Drawing for INCAVA

USPTO serial 79173049

INCAVA

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Reg. 4957956Status 404
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
May 17, 2016
Examiner
CRENNAN, KEVIN GERARD
Law office
GENERIC WEB UPDATE

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with INCAVA?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

Stewart J. Bellus & Sara M. Dorchak

Stewart J. Bellus & Sara M. Dorchak Collard & Roe, P.C.1077 Northern Blvd.Roslyn, NY 11576UNITED STATES

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
011Sanitary installations, namely, bath tubs [, shower trays, wash-hand basins in the nature of sinks; accessories for the aforesaid goods, namely, water inlets and outlets in the nature of faucets and tubes and pipes, bath tub fitted linings, bath tub panels, jets for spa installations, lighting for bath tubs, and structural parts in the nature of pedestals and base frames for bath tubs and shower trays, bath tub fitted covers ]SECTION 70 - CANCELLEDโ€”

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited ยง2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Sep 5, 2025DENANOTIFICATION OF EFFECT OF CANCELLATION OF INTL REG E-MAILEDโ€”
Sep 5, 2025DETHDEATH OF INTERNATIONAL REGISTRATIONโ€”
May 17, 2025REM4COURTESY REMINDER - SEC. 71 (10-YR) E-MAILEDโ€”
Sep 11, 2023INNPPARTIAL INVALIDATION PROCESSED BY THE IBโ€”
Aug 15, 2023INPSPARTIAL INVALIDATION OF REG EXT PROTECTION SENT TO IBโ€”
Aug 14, 2023INPCINVALIDATION PROCESSEDโ€”
Jul 17, 2023INPRPARTIAL INVALIDATION OF REG EXT PROTECTION CREATEDโ€”
Nov 17, 2022NA71NOTICE OF ACCEPTANCE OF SEC. 71 - E-MAILEDโ€”
Nov 17, 202271AGREGISTERED-SEC.71 ACCEPTEDโ€”
Oct 24, 2022APRECASE ASSIGNED TO POST REGISTRATION PARALEGALโ€”
May 4, 2022ES71TEAS SECTION 71 RECEIVEDโ€”
Sep 15, 2016FINOFINAL DECISION TRANSACTION PROCESSED BY IBโ€”
Aug 19, 2016FICSFINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE SENT TO IBโ€”
Aug 19, 2016FIMPFINAL DISPOSITION PROCESSEDโ€”
Aug 17, 2016FICRFINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IBโ€”
May 17, 2016R.PRREGISTERED-PRINCIPAL REGISTERYour trademark is registered on the Principal Register โ€” the strongest form of federal trademark protection. You may use the ยฎ symbol for the covered goods and services. Maintenance filings (Section 8 and renewals) are required to keep the registration alive.
Mar 1, 2016PUBOPUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITIONYour mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance.
Feb 27, 2016GPNXNOTIFICATION PROCESSED BY IBโ€”
Feb 10, 2016OPNSNOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION SENT TO IBโ€”
Feb 10, 2016NPUBNOTICE OF PUBLICATIONโ€”
Feb 10, 2016OP2RNOTICE OF START OF OPPOSITION PERIOD CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IBโ€”
Jan 27, 2016CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTERโ€”
Jan 18, 2016ARAAATTORNEY/DOM.REP.REVOKED AND/OR APPOINTEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action โ€” typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Jan 18, 2016REAPTEAS REVOKE/APP/CHANGE ADDR OF ATTY/DOM REP RECEIVEDโ€”
Jan 18, 2016TEMETEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTEREDโ€”
Jan 18, 2016CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICEโ€”
Jan 18, 2016TROATEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action โ€” typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Nov 27, 2015RFNTREFUSAL PROCESSED BY IBโ€”
Nov 6, 2015RFCSNON-FINAL ACTION MAILED - REFUSAL SENT TO IBโ€”
Nov 6, 2015RFRRREFUSAL PROCESSED BY MPUโ€”
Nov 6, 2015RFCRNON-FINAL ACTION (IB REFUSAL) PREPARED FOR REVIEWโ€”
Nov 5, 2015CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Nov 4, 2015DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINERโ€”
Oct 3, 2015MAFRAPPLICATION FILING RECEIPT MAILEDโ€”
Sep 29, 2015NWOSNEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTEREDโ€”
Sep 24, 2015SDRCSN ASSIGNED FOR SECT 66A SUBSEQ DESIG FROM IBโ€”

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance