USPTO serial 79173125
HONEST TO GOODNESS
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Status 402
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- MORRIS,KRISTINA KLOIBER
- Law office
- TTAB
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with HONEST TO GOODNESS?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Mark Terry
MARK TERRY MARK TERRY PA801 BRICKELL AVE SUITE 900MIAMI, FL 33131UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 029 | Nut paste; jellies; jams; tahini; snack foods, namely, fruit-based snack foods and nut-based snack food; dried foods, namely, dried fruits and dried vegetables; food products containing vegetables, namely, vegetable chips and vegetable paste; food products made from cooked fruits, namely, fruit conserves and fruit paste; food products made from cooked nuts, namely, nut-based spread and nut-based food bars, food products made from cooked vegetables, namely, vegetable paste; food products made from dried fruits, namely, fruit-based food bars; food products made from dried nuts, namely, nut-based food bar; food products made from dried vegetables, namely, dried vegetables in powdered form; food products made from preserved fruits, namely, fruit preserves; food products made from preserved nuts, namely, nut-based food bars; food products made from preserved vegetables, namely, vegetable paste; preserved food products of fruits, namely, dried fruits and fruit preserves; preserved food products of vegetables, namely, vegetable paste; snack foods made from dried vegetables; processed, cooked and dried edible seaweed; and snack foods consisting principally of vegetables | ABANDONED | — |
| 030 | coffee; artificial coffee; coffee substitutes; tea; herbal teas; flour, pasta; dried herbs; and fruit sauces excluding cranberry sauce and applesauce | ABANDONED | — |
| 031 | Unprocessed nuts; unprocessed grains; unprocessed beans; unprocessed edible seeds; malt for brewing and distilling; unprocessed edible sesame; and unprocessed nut mixes and unprocessed grain mixes | ABANDONED | — |
| 035 | online retail store services and wholesale store services of minerals being rock salt | ABANDONED | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
- Other trademarks owned by Organic Marketing Australia Pty Limited
- Other trademarks owned by Organic Marketing Australia Pty Limited
- Other trademarks in Class 029
- Other trademarks in Class 030
- Other trademarks in Class 031
- Other trademarks in Class 035
- Similar marks named HONEST TO GOODNESS
- Recently changed USPTO trademarks
- Recently filed trademarks
- Browse all trademark records
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Jan 1, 2026 | DENA | NOTIFICATION OF EFFECT OF CANCELLATION OF INTL REG E-MAILED | — |
| Jan 1, 2026 | DETH | DEATH OF INTERNATIONAL REGISTRATION | — |
| Aug 22, 2025 | LIMG | LIMITATION OF GOODS RECEIVED FROM IB | — |
| Jun 26, 2025 | NREP | NEW REPRESENTATIVE AT IB RECEIVED | — |
| Jun 19, 2025 | NREP | NEW REPRESENTATIVE AT IB RECEIVED | — |
| Apr 12, 2019 | FINT | FINAL DECISION TRANSACTION PROCESSED BY IB | — |
| Mar 26, 2019 | FICS | FINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE SENT TO IB | — |
| Mar 26, 2019 | FICR | FINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB | — |
| Mar 26, 2018 | MAB4 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - INTER PARTES DECISION | — |
| Mar 26, 2018 | ABN4 | ABANDONMENT - AFTER INTER PARTES DECISION | — |
| Mar 26, 2018 | OP.T | OPPOSITION TERMINATED NO. 999999 | — |
| Mar 26, 2018 | OP.S | OPPOSITION SUSTAINED NO. 999999 | — |
| Jan 11, 2018 | RFNT | REFUSAL PROCESSED BY IB | — |
| Dec 16, 2017 | OP.I | OPPOSITION INSTITUTED NO. 999999 | — |
| Dec 14, 2017 | OPNS | OPPOSITION NOTICE (IB REFUSAL) SENT TO IB | — |
| Dec 14, 2017 | OPNC | OPPOSITION NOTICE (IB REFUSAL) CREATED | — |
| Nov 3, 2017 | GPNX | NOTIFICATION PROCESSED BY IB | — |
| Aug 29, 2017 | ETOF | EXTENSION OF TIME TO OPPOSE RECEIVED | — |
| Aug 15, 2017 | NPUB | OFFICIAL GAZETTE PUBLICATION CONFIRMATION E-MAILED | — |
| Aug 15, 2017 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Jul 26, 2017 | OPNS | NOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION SENT TO IB | — |
| Jul 26, 2017 | OP2R | NOTICE OF START OF OPPOSITION PERIOD CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB | — |
| Jul 26, 2017 | NONP | NOTIFICATION OF NOTICE OF PUBLICATION E-MAILED | — |
| Jul 7, 2017 | PREV | LAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED | — |
| Jul 5, 2017 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Jun 14, 2017 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Jun 13, 2017 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jun 13, 2017 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Mar 17, 2017 | OPNX | NOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION - PROCESSED BY IB | — |
| Mar 1, 2017 | OPNS | NOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION SENT TO IB | — |
| Mar 1, 2017 | OPNR | NOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB | — |
| Dec 13, 2016 | GNRN | NOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Dec 13, 2016 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Dec 13, 2016 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Nov 19, 2016 | RCCK | SUSPENSION CHECKED - TO ATTORNEY FOR ACTION | — |
| Nov 14, 2016 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| May 3, 2016 | GNS3 | NOTIFICATION OF LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| May 3, 2016 | GNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| May 3, 2016 | CNSL | SUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN | — |
| Apr 12, 2016 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Apr 11, 2016 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Apr 11, 2016 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Oct 30, 2015 | RFNT | REFUSAL PROCESSED BY IB | — |
| Oct 9, 2015 | RFCS | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED - REFUSAL SENT TO IB | — |
| Oct 9, 2015 | RFRR | REFUSAL PROCESSED BY MPU | — |
| Oct 9, 2015 | RFCR | NON-FINAL ACTION (IB REFUSAL) PREPARED FOR REVIEW | — |
| Oct 8, 2015 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Oct 6, 2015 | MAFR | APPLICATION FILING RECEIPT MAILED | — |
| Oct 2, 2015 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Oct 2, 2015 | NWOS | NEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED | — |
| Oct 1, 2015 | REPR | SN ASSIGNED FOR SECT 66A APPL FROM IB | — |