Drawing for ONEPAGER

USPTO serial 79173237

ONEPAGER

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 402
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
LEE, YATSYE ISADORA
Law office
TMEG LAW OFFICE 107 - EXAMINING ATTORNEY ASSIGNED

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with ONEPAGER?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

David H. Voorhees

David H. Voorhees Merek, Blackmon & Voorhees, LLC673 South Washington St.Alexandria, VA 22314UNITED STATES

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
035Business organizational project management; public relations; collecting and compiling of subject related press articles; business management for others, namely, promoting the business interests of third parties towards decision-makers and other persons; Business networking services in the nature of arranging and supervising contacts in relation to business matters; compiling and processing, namely, summarizing the content, of results from research and discussions in relation to business mattersSECTION 70 - CANCELLED—
041Arranging and conducting of educational conferences, congresses, symposiums, workshops in the field of strategic communication consultancy and development of communication concepts; writing and publishing of texts, except advertising textsSECTION 70 - CANCELLED—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Nov 7, 2025DETHDEATH OF INTERNATIONAL REGISTRATION—
Sep 15, 2023ADCHCHANGE OF NAME/ADDRESS REC'D FROM IB—
Mar 26, 2021NREPNEW REPRESENTATIVE AT IB RECEIVED—
Jan 26, 2018FINTFINAL DECISION TRANSACTION PROCESSED BY IB—
Dec 22, 2017FICSFINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE SENT TO IB—
Dec 22, 2017FICRFINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB—
Mar 17, 2017OPNXNOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION - PROCESSED BY IB—
Mar 1, 2017OPNSNOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION SENT TO IB—
Mar 1, 2017OPNRNOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB—
Dec 22, 2016MAB2ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - FAILURE TO RESPONDThe trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time.
Dec 22, 2016ABN2ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSEThe trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time.
Aug 5, 2016RFNTREFUSAL PROCESSED BY IB—
May 20, 2016CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
May 19, 2016CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Apr 19, 2016TEMETEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED—
Apr 19, 2016CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Apr 19, 2016TROATEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Nov 8, 2015RFNTREFUSAL PROCESSED BY IB—
Oct 19, 2015RFCSNON-FINAL ACTION MAILED - REFUSAL SENT TO IB—
Oct 19, 2015RFRRREFUSAL PROCESSED BY MPU—
Oct 15, 2015RFCRNON-FINAL ACTION (IB REFUSAL) PREPARED FOR REVIEW—
Oct 14, 2015CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Oct 9, 2015MAFRAPPLICATION FILING RECEIPT MAILED—
Oct 5, 2015DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Oct 5, 2015NWOSNEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED—
Oct 2, 2015LIMILIMITATION FROM ORIGINAL APPLICATION ENTERED—
Oct 1, 2015REPRSN ASSIGNED FOR SECT 66A APPL FROM IB—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance