USPTO serial 79173431
ODESSA
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Status 402
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- PINO, BRIAN
- Law office
- TMO LAW OFFICE 114 - EXAMINING ATTORNEY ASSIGNED
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with ODESSA?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Goods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 033 | Wine | SECTION 70 - CANCELLED | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Feb 12, 2026 | DETH | DEATH OF INTERNATIONAL REGISTRATION | — |
| Dec 11, 2025 | DETH | DEATH OF INTERNATIONAL REGISTRATION | — |
| Jul 27, 2018 | FINT | FINAL DECISION TRANSACTION PROCESSED BY IB | — |
| Jul 3, 2018 | FICS | FINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE SENT TO IB | — |
| Jul 3, 2018 | FICR | FINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB | — |
| Dec 21, 2017 | CHLD | CHANGE OF OWNER RECEIVED FROM IB | — |
| Jul 3, 2017 | MAB3 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - AFTER EX PARTE APPEAL | — |
| Jun 19, 2017 | ABN3 | ABANDONMENT - AFTER EX PARTE APPEAL | — |
| Jun 19, 2017 | EXPT | EXPARTE APPEAL TERMINATED | — |
| Jun 7, 2017 | EXFB | EXPARTE APPEAL DISMISSED - FAILURE TO FILE BRIEF | — |
| Mar 17, 2017 | OPNX | NOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION - PROCESSED BY IB | — |
| Mar 7, 2017 | RECD | ACTION DENYING REQ FOR RECON MAILED | — |
| Mar 7, 2017 | CNCF | ACTION CONTINUING FINAL - COMPLETED | — |
| Mar 1, 2017 | OPNS | NOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION SENT TO IB | — |
| Mar 1, 2017 | OPNR | NOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB | — |
| Feb 14, 2017 | EXPI | EX PARTE APPEAL-INSTITUTED | — |
| Feb 14, 2017 | JURT | JURISDICTION RESTORED TO EXAMINING ATTORNEY | — |
| Feb 8, 2017 | EXAF | EXPARTE APPEAL RECEIVED AT TTAB | — |
| Feb 6, 2017 | NREV | NOTICE OF REVIVAL - MAILED | — |
| Feb 6, 2017 | PGTT | PETITION GRANTED - TTAB APPEAL FILED | — |
| Feb 6, 2017 | APET | ASSIGNED TO PETITION STAFF | — |
| Feb 1, 2017 | EXAF | EXPARTE APPEAL RECEIVED AT TTAB | — |
| Jan 23, 2017 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Jan 23, 2017 | PROA | TEAS PETITION TO REVIVE RECEIVED | — |
| Nov 21, 2016 | MAB2 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - FAILURE TO RESPOND | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Nov 21, 2016 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Apr 25, 2016 | GNFN | NOTIFICATION OF FINAL REFUSAL EMAILED | — |
| Apr 25, 2016 | GNFR | FINAL REFUSAL E-MAILED | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Apr 25, 2016 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL WRITTEN | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Apr 20, 2016 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Apr 20, 2016 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Apr 13, 2016 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Apr 13, 2016 | ACEC | AMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED | — |
| Apr 13, 2016 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Mar 31, 2016 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Mar 21, 2016 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Nov 8, 2015 | RFNT | REFUSAL PROCESSED BY IB | — |
| Oct 19, 2015 | RFCS | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED - REFUSAL SENT TO IB | — |
| Oct 19, 2015 | RFRR | REFUSAL PROCESSED BY MPU | — |
| Oct 14, 2015 | RFCR | NON-FINAL ACTION (IB REFUSAL) PREPARED FOR REVIEW | — |
| Oct 13, 2015 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Oct 9, 2015 | MAFR | APPLICATION FILING RECEIPT MAILED | — |
| Oct 5, 2015 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Oct 5, 2015 | NWOS | NEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED | — |
| Oct 1, 2015 | REPR | SN ASSIGNED FOR SECT 66A APPL FROM IB | — |