USPTO serial 79173535
VENTILFLEX
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Reg. 5000679Status 709
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- Jul 19, 2016
- Examiner
- FLETCHER, TRACY L
- Law office
- PUBLICATION AND ISSUE SECTION
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with VENTILFLEX?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Geza C. Ziegler Jr.
Geza C. Ziegler Jr. ZIEGLER IP LAW GROUP, LLC.3135 Easton TurnpikeSHU IHUB, W-256Fairfield, CT 06825Goods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 001 | Plastics in unprocessed form, in liquid or paste form, Unprocessed synthetic resins for use in the manufacture of plastic molding compounds; Dispersions of plastics for the use in the manufacture of vents and ventilation ducts in the nature of plastic-based composite materials for covering the internal surfaces of masonry and prefabricated vents and ventilation ducts | SECTION 71 - CANCELLED | — |
| 019 | Sealant coatings for the interior of masonry and prefabricated vents and ventilation ducts made from plastic, plastic resins or plastic-based composite materials which, after being drawn into place in a soft form, are inflated and hardened by steam, forming to the path of the duct or the shape of the internal liner of the canals or ductings | SECTION 71 - CANCELLED | — |
| 037 | Installation, repair and renovation of masonry and prefabricated vents and ventilation ducts in which the duct liners are made from plastic-based composite materials that, after being drawn into place in a soft form, are inflated and hardened by steam, or the path of the system has been built using such liners | SECTION 71 - CANCELLED | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
- Other trademarks owned by KOMPOZITOR Kft.
- Other trademarks owned by KOMPOZITOR Kft.
- Other trademarks owned by KOMPOZITOR Kft.
- Other trademarks in Class 001
- Other trademarks in Class 019
- Other trademarks in Class 037
- Similar marks named VENTILFLEX
- Recently changed USPTO trademarks
- Recently filed trademarks
- Browse all trademark records
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sep 22, 2025 | NREP | NEW REPRESENTATIVE AT IB RECEIVED | — |
| May 17, 2025 | Further Decision Processed by IB | — | |
| Mar 25, 2025 | XXSS | GENERIC MADRID TRANSACTION SENT TO IB | — |
| Mar 25, 2025 | INNA | INVALIDATION REVIEWED - NO ACTION REQUIRED BY OFFICE | — |
| Mar 25, 2025 | XXCR | GENERIC MADRID TRANSACTION CREATED | — |
| Nov 15, 2024 | RNWL | INTERNATIONAL REGISTRATION RENEWED | — |
| Oct 3, 2023 | INTR | TOTAL INVALIDATION OF REG EXT PROTECTION CREATED | — |
| Apr 14, 2023 | CORR | CORRECTION FROM IB ENTERED - NO REVIEW REQUIRED | — |
| Apr 13, 2023 | CORN | CORRECTION FROM THE IB EXAMINED, NO ACTION IS NEEDED | — |
| Apr 4, 2023 | CRCV | CORRECTION TRANSACTION RECEIVED FROM IB | — |
| Apr 4, 2023 | CRCV | CORRECTION TRANSACTION RECEIVED FROM IB | — |
| Feb 3, 2023 | C71T | CANCELLED SECTION 71 | — |
| Jun 7, 2022 | TCCA | TEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED | — |
| Jun 7, 2022 | ARAA | ATTORNEY/DOM.REP.REVOKED AND/OR APPOINTED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Jun 7, 2022 | REAP | TEAS REVOKE/APP/CHANGE ADDR OF ATTY/DOM REP RECEIVED | — |
| Jul 19, 2021 | REM3 | COURTESY REMINDER - SEC. 71 (6-YR) E-MAILED | — |
| Dec 2, 2016 | FINO | FINAL DECISION TRANSACTION PROCESSED BY IB | — |
| Nov 15, 2016 | FICS | FINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE SENT TO IB | — |
| Nov 15, 2016 | FIMP | FINAL DISPOSITION PROCESSED | — |
| Oct 19, 2016 | FICR | FINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB | — |
| Jul 19, 2016 | R.PR | REGISTERED-PRINCIPAL REGISTER | Your trademark is registered on the Principal Register — the strongest form of federal trademark protection. You may use the ® symbol for the covered goods and services. Maintenance filings (Section 8 and renewals) are required to keep the registration alive. |
| Jun 2, 2016 | NREP | NEW REPRESENTATIVE AT IB RECEIVED | — |
| May 3, 2016 | NPUB | OFFICIAL GAZETTE PUBLICATION CONFIRMATION E-MAILED | — |
| May 3, 2016 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Apr 13, 2016 | NONP | NOTIFICATION OF NOTICE OF PUBLICATION E-MAILED | — |
| Mar 30, 2016 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Mar 29, 2016 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Mar 29, 2016 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Mar 29, 2016 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Nov 8, 2015 | RFNT | REFUSAL PROCESSED BY IB | — |
| Oct 21, 2015 | RFCS | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED - REFUSAL SENT TO IB | — |
| Oct 21, 2015 | RFRR | REFUSAL PROCESSED BY MPU | — |
| Oct 20, 2015 | RFCR | NON-FINAL ACTION (IB REFUSAL) PREPARED FOR REVIEW | — |
| Oct 19, 2015 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Oct 13, 2015 | MAFR | APPLICATION FILING RECEIPT MAILED | — |
| Oct 9, 2015 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Oct 9, 2015 | NWOS | NEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED | — |
| Oct 8, 2015 | REPR | SN ASSIGNED FOR SECT 66A APPL FROM IB | — |