Drawing for ANTAMEGA

USPTO serial 79173616

ANTAMEGA

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 402
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
YOUNG, THOMAS PAUL
Law office
TMO LAW OFFICE 120 - EXAMINING ATTORNEY ASSIGNED

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with ANTAMEGA?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
001Oil for the food industry (terms considered too vague by the International Bureau - rule 13.2.b) of the Common Regulations); oil for the food industry containing krill oil (terms considered too vague by the International Bureau - rule 13.2.b) of the Common Regulations); powder for the food industry (terms considered too vague by the International Bureau (terms considered too vague by the International Bureau; powder for the food industry containing krill oil (terms considered too vague by the International Bureau - rule 13.2.b) of the Common Regulations); emulsions for the food industry (terms considered too vague by the International Bureau - rule 13.2.b) of the Common Regulations); emulsions for the food industry containing krill oil (terms considered too vague by the International Bureau - rule 13.2.b) of the Common Regulations)SECTION 70 - CANCELLED—
005Krill oil for pharmaceutical purposes; krill oil powder for pharmaceutical purposes; krill oil extracts for pharmaceutical purposes; food for babies containing krill oil; krill oil for medical purposes; krill oil powder for medical purposes; krill oil extracts for medical purposes; krill oil for medicinal purposes; krill oil powder for medicinal purposes; krill oil extracts for medicinal purposesSECTION 70 - CANCELLED—
029Krill oil for food; krill oil powder for food; krill oil extracts for foodSECTION 70 - CANCELLED—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Jul 11, 2025DENANOTIFICATION OF EFFECT OF CANCELLATION OF INTL REG E-MAILED—
Jul 11, 2025DETHDEATH OF INTERNATIONAL REGISTRATION—
Feb 16, 2024NREPNEW REPRESENTATIVE AT IB RECEIVED—
Feb 5, 2022NREPNEW REPRESENTATIVE AT IB RECEIVED—
Feb 5, 2022NREPNEW REPRESENTATIVE AT IB RECEIVED—
Mar 13, 2020CHLDCHANGE OF OWNER RECEIVED FROM IB—
Sep 14, 2018CHLDCHANGE OF OWNER RECEIVED FROM IB—
Jun 9, 2017FINTFINAL DECISION TRANSACTION PROCESSED BY IB—
May 19, 2017FICSFINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE SENT TO IB—
May 19, 2017FICRFINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB—
Mar 24, 2017OPNXNOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION - PROCESSED BY IB—
Mar 8, 2017OPNSNOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION SENT TO IB—
Mar 8, 2017OPNRNOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB—
May 19, 2016MAB2ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - FAILURE TO RESPONDThe trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time.
May 19, 2016ABN2ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSEThe trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time.
Nov 8, 2015RFNTREFUSAL PROCESSED BY IB—
Nov 2, 2015TCCATEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED—
Oct 19, 2015RFCSNON-FINAL ACTION MAILED - REFUSAL SENT TO IB—
Oct 19, 2015RFRRREFUSAL PROCESSED BY MPU—
Oct 16, 2015RFCRNON-FINAL ACTION (IB REFUSAL) PREPARED FOR REVIEW—
Oct 15, 2015CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Oct 13, 2015MAFRAPPLICATION FILING RECEIPT MAILED—
Oct 9, 2015DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Oct 9, 2015NWOSNEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED—
Oct 8, 2015REPRSN ASSIGNED FOR SECT 66A APPL FROM IB—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance