Drawing for APL

USPTO serial 79173684

APL

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 402
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
ORNDORFF, LINDA
Law office
TMO LAW OFFICE 111 - EXAMINING ATTORNEY ASSIGNED

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with APL?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
003Cosmetic face powder; cosmetic pencils; cosmetic dyes; oils for cosmetic purposes; bath salts (cosmetic); colorants for toilet purposes; cosmetic cleansing creams; cleansing milk for toilet purposes; cosmetic creams; talcum powder for toilet use; make-up powder; face creams for cosmetic use; pomades for cosmetic purposes; bleaching preparations (decolorants) for cosmetic purposes; cosmetic hand creams; perfumed oils for cosmetics; make-up removing lotions; make-up removing milk; make-up removing preparations; cosmeticsSECTION 70 - CANCELLED—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Feb 26, 2026DETHDEATH OF INTERNATIONAL REGISTRATION—
Jul 28, 2017FINTFINAL DECISION TRANSACTION PROCESSED BY IB—
Jul 12, 2017FICSFINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE SENT TO IB—
Jul 12, 2017FICRFINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB—
Jun 29, 2017ADCHCHANGE OF NAME/ADDRESS REC'D FROM IB—
Mar 24, 2017OPNXNOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION - PROCESSED BY IB—
Mar 8, 2017OPNSNOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION SENT TO IB—
Mar 8, 2017OPNRNOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB—
Jul 12, 2016MAB2ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - FAILURE TO RESPONDThe trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time.
Jul 12, 2016ABN2ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSEThe trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time.
Dec 31, 2015RFNTREFUSAL PROCESSED BY IB—
Dec 4, 2015RFCSNON-FINAL ACTION MAILED - REFUSAL SENT TO IB—
Dec 4, 2015RFRRREFUSAL PROCESSED BY MPU—
Dec 2, 2015RFCRNON-FINAL ACTION (IB REFUSAL) PREPARED FOR REVIEW—
Dec 1, 2015CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Nov 30, 2015DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Oct 13, 2015MAFRAPPLICATION FILING RECEIPT MAILED—
Oct 9, 2015NWOSNEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED—
Oct 8, 2015REPRSN ASSIGNED FOR SECT 66A APPL FROM IB—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance