USPTO serial 79173760
SUMCO TECHNOLOGY
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Reg. 4975574Status 709
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- Jun 14, 2016
- Examiner
- POWER, MARGARET
- Law office
- PUBLICATION AND ISSUE SECTION
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with SUMCO TECHNOLOGY?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Howard N. Aronson
Howard N. Aronson Lackenbach Siegel LLPOne Chase RoadScarsdale, NY 10583UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 009 | Solar cells; silicon wafers for solar cells; semiconductor wafers, namely, compound semiconductor wafers, SOI (Silicon-On-Insulator) wafers, and strained silicon wafers; semiconductor silicon wafers; single-crystal silicon wafers; ingots of semiconductor silicon for making silicon wafers sold as a component part of silicon wafers; single-crystal silicon ingots for integrated circuits sold as a component part of integrated circuits | SECTION 71 - CANCELLED | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| May 9, 2025 | Further Decision Processed by IB | — | |
| Mar 21, 2025 | XXSS | GENERIC MADRID TRANSACTION SENT TO IB | — |
| Mar 21, 2025 | INNA | INVALIDATION REVIEWED - NO ACTION REQUIRED BY OFFICE | — |
| Mar 21, 2025 | XXCR | GENERIC MADRID TRANSACTION CREATED | — |
| Aug 30, 2023 | INTR | TOTAL INVALIDATION OF REG EXT PROTECTION CREATED | — |
| Dec 30, 2022 | C71T | CANCELLED SECTION 71 | — |
| Jun 14, 2021 | REM3 | COURTESY REMINDER - SEC. 71 (6-YR) E-MAILED | — |
| Oct 29, 2019 | NREP | NEW REPRESENTATIVE AT IB RECEIVED | — |
| Feb 22, 2018 | RNWL | INTERNATIONAL REGISTRATION RENEWED | — |
| Apr 14, 2017 | FINO | FINAL DECISION TRANSACTION PROCESSED BY IB | — |
| Mar 24, 2017 | INNT | TOTAL INVALIDATION PROCESSED BY THE IB | — |
| Sep 16, 2016 | FICS | FINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE SENT TO IB | — |
| Sep 16, 2016 | FIMP | FINAL DISPOSITION PROCESSED | — |
| Sep 14, 2016 | FICR | FINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB | — |
| Jun 14, 2016 | R.PR | REGISTERED-PRINCIPAL REGISTER | Your trademark is registered on the Principal Register — the strongest form of federal trademark protection. You may use the ® symbol for the covered goods and services. Maintenance filings (Section 8 and renewals) are required to keep the registration alive. |
| Apr 1, 2016 | GPNX | NOTIFICATION PROCESSED BY IB | — |
| Mar 29, 2016 | NPUB | OFFICIAL GAZETTE PUBLICATION CONFIRMATION E-MAILED | — |
| Mar 29, 2016 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Mar 9, 2016 | OPNS | NOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION SENT TO IB | — |
| Mar 9, 2016 | OP2R | NOTICE OF START OF OPPOSITION PERIOD CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB | — |
| Mar 9, 2016 | NONP | NOTIFICATION OF NOTICE OF PUBLICATION E-MAILED | — |
| Feb 25, 2016 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Feb 24, 2016 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Feb 24, 2016 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Feb 24, 2016 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Nov 17, 2015 | RFNT | REFUSAL PROCESSED BY IB | — |
| Oct 28, 2015 | RFCS | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED - REFUSAL SENT TO IB | — |
| Oct 28, 2015 | RFRR | REFUSAL PROCESSED BY MPU | — |
| Oct 27, 2015 | RFCR | NON-FINAL ACTION (IB REFUSAL) PREPARED FOR REVIEW | — |
| Oct 26, 2015 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Oct 20, 2015 | MAFR | APPLICATION FILING RECEIPT MAILED | — |
| Oct 16, 2015 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Oct 16, 2015 | NWOS | NEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED | — |
| Oct 14, 2015 | LIMI | LIMITATION FROM ORIGINAL APPLICATION ENTERED | — |
| Oct 8, 2015 | SDRC | SN ASSIGNED FOR SECT 66A SUBSEQ DESIG FROM IB | — |