USPTO serial 79173761
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Tokyo 105-8634, JP
Tokyo 105-8634, JP
Tokyo 105-8634, JP
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Howard N. Aronson
HOWARD N. ARONSON LACKENBACH SIEGEL LLP1 CHASE RDSCARSDALE, NY 10583-4156UNITED STATES| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 009 | Solar cells; silicon wafers for solar cells; semiconductor wafers, namely, compound semiconductor wafers, SOI (Silicon-On-Insulator) wafers, and strained silicon wafers; semiconductor silicon wafers; single-crystal silicon wafers; ingots of semiconductor silicon for making silicon wafers sold as a component part of silicon wafers; single-crystal silicon ingots for integrated circuits sold as a component part of integrated circuits | SECTION 71 - CANCELLED | — |
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Oct 10, 2023 | INTR | TOTAL INVALIDATION OF REG EXT PROTECTION CREATED | — |
| Feb 10, 2023 | C71T | CANCELLED SECTION 71 | — |
| Jul 26, 2021 | REM3 | COURTESY REMINDER - SEC. 71 (6-YR) E-MAILED | — |
| Oct 29, 2019 | NREP | NEW REPRESENTATIVE AT IB RECEIVED | — |
| Aug 4, 2018 | RINX | USPTO CORRECTION PROCESSED BY IB | — |
| Aug 4, 2018 | RINX | USPTO CORRECTION PROCESSED BY IB | — |
| Aug 3, 2018 | RINX | USPTO CORRECTION PROCESSED BY IB | — |
| Aug 2, 2018 | RNWL | INTERNATIONAL REGISTRATION RENEWED | — |
| Sep 29, 2017 | INNT | TOTAL INVALIDATION PROCESSED BY THE IB | — |
| Aug 7, 2017 | IRRH | IRREGULARITY FROM IB EXAMINED BY MPU | — |
| May 16, 2017 | IRFI | IRREGULARITY ON FINAL DECISION RECEIVED FROM IB | — |
| Mar 24, 2017 | INNT | TOTAL INVALIDATION PROCESSED BY THE IB | — |
| Nov 18, 2016 | FICS | FINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE SENT TO IB | — |
| Nov 18, 2016 | FIMP | FINAL DISPOSITION PROCESSED | — |
| Oct 26, 2016 | FICR | FINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB | — |
| Jul 26, 2016 | R.PR | REGISTERED-PRINCIPAL REGISTER | Your trademark is registered on the Principal Register — the strongest form of federal trademark protection. You may use the ® symbol for the covered goods and services. Maintenance filings (Section 8 and renewals) are required to keep the registration alive. |
| May 10, 2016 | NPUB | OFFICIAL GAZETTE PUBLICATION CONFIRMATION E-MAILED | — |
| May 10, 2016 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Apr 20, 2016 | NONP | NOTIFICATION OF NOTICE OF PUBLICATION E-MAILED | — |
| Apr 1, 2016 | PREV | LAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED | — |
| Mar 31, 2016 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Mar 9, 2016 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Mar 9, 2016 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Mar 2, 2016 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Feb 24, 2016 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Nov 17, 2015 | RFNT | REFUSAL PROCESSED BY IB | — |
| Oct 28, 2015 | RFCS | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED - REFUSAL SENT TO IB | — |
| Oct 28, 2015 | RFRR | REFUSAL PROCESSED BY MPU | — |
| Oct 27, 2015 | RFCR | NON-FINAL ACTION (IB REFUSAL) PREPARED FOR REVIEW | — |
| Oct 26, 2015 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Oct 20, 2015 | MAFR | APPLICATION FILING RECEIPT MAILED | — |
| Oct 16, 2015 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Oct 16, 2015 | NWOS | NEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED | — |
| Oct 15, 2015 | LIMI | LIMITATION FROM ORIGINAL APPLICATION ENTERED | — |
| Oct 8, 2015 | SDRC | SN ASSIGNED FOR SECT 66A SUBSEQ DESIG FROM IB | — |