Drawing for ELOOP

USPTO serial 79173798

ELOOP

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
CORNWELL, ANDREA B
Law office
TMO LAW OFFICE 115 - EXAMINING ATTORNEY ASSIGNED

What this means

These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.

Status 602: These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances.

Need help with ELOOP?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
009Portable telephones; hands free kits for phones; network communication devices; telephone sheath; earphone; cabinets for loudspeakers; headphones; monitoring apparatus, electric; chargers for electric batteries; batteries, electricSECTION 70 - CANCELLED—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

DateCodeEventWhat it means
May 30, 2021DENANOTIFICATION OF EFFECT OF CANCELLATION OF INTL REG MAILED—
May 29, 2021DETHDEATH OF INTERNATIONAL REGISTRATION—
Jun 30, 2017FINTFINAL DECISION TRANSACTION PROCESSED BY IB—
Jun 12, 2017FICSFINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE SENT TO IB—
Jun 10, 2017FICRFINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB—
Apr 1, 2017OPNXNOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION - PROCESSED BY IB—
Mar 15, 2017OPNSNOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION SENT TO IB—
Mar 15, 2017OPNRNOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB—
Jun 10, 2016MAB2ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - FAILURE TO RESPONDThe trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time.
Jun 10, 2016ABN2ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSEThe trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time.
Dec 4, 2015RFNTREFUSAL PROCESSED BY IB—
Nov 13, 2015RFCSNON-FINAL ACTION MAILED - REFUSAL SENT TO IB—
Nov 13, 2015RFRRREFUSAL PROCESSED BY MPU—
Nov 11, 2015RFCRNON-FINAL ACTION (IB REFUSAL) PREPARED FOR REVIEW—
Nov 10, 2015CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Nov 4, 2015DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Oct 20, 2015MAFRAPPLICATION FILING RECEIPT MAILED—
Oct 16, 2015NWOSNEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED—
Oct 15, 2015REPRSN ASSIGNED FOR SECT 66A APPL FROM IB—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance