USPTO serial 79173824
DYNABLOCKPRESS
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Status 402
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- LIWINSKI, HELENE AGNES
- Law office
- TMEG LAW OFFICE 104 - EXAMINING ATTORNEY ASSIGNED
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with DYNABLOCKPRESS?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Goods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 007 | Machines for industrial purposes, namely, presses; machines for industrial purposes, namely, presses for the continuous extrusion of wood chip and particle based semi-finished products; extrusion molding machines; machines for the formation of parts of wood pallets; plants for the formation of parts of wood pallets; woodworking machines and machine tools | SECTION 70 - CANCELLED | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Aug 15, 2025 | DETH | DEATH OF INTERNATIONAL REGISTRATION | — |
| May 13, 2022 | NREP | NEW REPRESENTATIVE AT IB RECEIVED | — |
| Jun 30, 2017 | FINT | FINAL DECISION TRANSACTION PROCESSED BY IB | — |
| Jun 14, 2017 | FICS | FINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE SENT TO IB | — |
| Jun 14, 2017 | FICR | FINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB | — |
| Apr 1, 2017 | OPNX | NOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION - PROCESSED BY IB | — |
| Mar 15, 2017 | OPNS | NOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION SENT TO IB | — |
| Mar 15, 2017 | OPNR | NOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB | — |
| Jun 14, 2016 | MAB2 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - FAILURE TO RESPOND | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Jun 14, 2016 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Jun 13, 2016 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Nov 8, 2015 | RFNT | REFUSAL PROCESSED BY IB | — |
| Oct 23, 2015 | MAFR | APPLICATION FILING RECEIPT MAILED | — |
| Oct 22, 2015 | RFCS | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED - REFUSAL SENT TO IB | — |
| Oct 22, 2015 | RFRR | REFUSAL PROCESSED BY MPU | — |
| Oct 21, 2015 | RFCR | NON-FINAL ACTION (IB REFUSAL) PREPARED FOR REVIEW | — |
| Oct 20, 2015 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Oct 19, 2015 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Oct 19, 2015 | NWOS | NEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED | — |
| Oct 16, 2015 | LIMI | LIMITATION FROM ORIGINAL APPLICATION ENTERED | — |
| Oct 15, 2015 | REPR | SN ASSIGNED FOR SECT 66A APPL FROM IB | — |