Drawing for REDLINE

USPTO serial 79173842

REDLINE

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 402
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
FALK, JONATHAN ROBERT
Law office
TMO LAW OFFICE 111 - EXAMINING ATTORNEY ASSIGNED

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with REDLINE?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
009Apparatus for recording, surveying, processing, transmission and reproduction of sound and images; antennas, satellites, satellite dishes antennas, terrestrial antennas, indoor terrestrial antennas, their parts; TV set top box; televisions, closed circuit television (CCTV) cameras, CCTV video cameras, CCTV cameras' accessories, digital video recorders; LNB converters; audio/video signal modulators and demodulators; digital satellite receivers, digital terrestrial receivers, satellite and terrestrial digital receivers, their partsSECTION 70 - CANCELLED—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Jan 29, 2026DETHDEATH OF INTERNATIONAL REGISTRATION—
Jun 23, 2017FINTFINAL DECISION TRANSACTION PROCESSED BY IB—
Jun 8, 2017FICSFINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE SENT TO IB—
Jun 8, 2017FICRFINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB—
Apr 1, 2017OPNXNOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION - PROCESSED BY IB—
Mar 15, 2017OPNSNOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION SENT TO IB—
Mar 15, 2017OPNRNOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB—
Jun 8, 2016MAB2ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - FAILURE TO RESPONDThe trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time.
Jun 8, 2016ABN2ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSEThe trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time.
Jun 8, 2016ATRVATTORNEY REVIEW COMPLETED—
Apr 5, 2016LIMELIMITATION FROM THE IB - REQUEST EXAM REVIEW—
Apr 1, 2016LIMGLIMITATION OF GOODS RECEIVED FROM IB—
Nov 17, 2015RFNTREFUSAL PROCESSED BY IB—
Oct 28, 2015RFCSNON-FINAL ACTION MAILED - REFUSAL SENT TO IB—
Oct 28, 2015RFRRREFUSAL PROCESSED BY MPU—
Oct 27, 2015RFCRNON-FINAL ACTION (IB REFUSAL) PREPARED FOR REVIEW—
Oct 26, 2015CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Oct 21, 2015DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Oct 20, 2015MAFRAPPLICATION FILING RECEIPT MAILED—
Oct 16, 2015NWOSNEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED—
Oct 15, 2015REPRSN ASSIGNED FOR SECT 66A APPL FROM IB—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance