USPTO serial 79173880
ROSENBERG IDP - INDIVIDUAL DEVELOPMENT PLAN
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Status 402
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- LAM, HAI-LY HUYNH
- Law office
- TMO LAW OFFICE 112 - EXAMINING ATTORNEY ASSIGNED
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with ROSENBERG IDP - INDIVIDUAL DEVELOPMENT PLAN?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Peter Meier
PETER MEIER OBT AGRORSCHACHERSTRASSE 63CH-9004 ST. GALLEN,SWITZERLANDGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 041 | Education; services, namely, providing classes and education in a variety of education systems (German, Swiss, Italian, UK and USA) and summer and winter camps in the field of primary and academic education; training in the field of preparation for further education at universities and for business- and social life; entertainment, namely, summer and winter camps, annual and gradusation balls with student performances; organizing community sporting and cultural events | SECTION 70 - CANCELLED | — |
| 042 | Scientific and technological services, namely, further development of the individual plans for their students by scientific research and scientific analysis in the field of primary and education; research and design relating thereto in the field of education systems and programs | SECTION 70 - CANCELLED | — |
| 043 | Services for providing food and drink; providing temporary accommodation for the students of the boarding and day school | SECTION 70 - CANCELLED | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
- Other trademarks owned by Pioneer Ventures AG
- Other trademarks owned by Institut auf dem Rosenberg AG
- Other trademarks in Class 041
- Other trademarks in Class 042
- Other trademarks in Class 043
- Similar marks named ROSENBERG IDP - INDIVIDUAL DEVELOPMENT PLAN
- Recently changed USPTO trademarks
- Recently filed trademarks
- Browse all trademark records
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Mar 12, 2026 | DETH | DEATH OF INTERNATIONAL REGISTRATION | — |
| Jan 24, 2025 | CHLD | CHANGE OF OWNER RECEIVED FROM IB | — |
| Apr 6, 2018 | FINT | FINAL DECISION TRANSACTION PROCESSED BY IB | — |
| Feb 13, 2018 | FICS | FINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE SENT TO IB | — |
| Feb 13, 2018 | FICR | FINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB | — |
| Apr 1, 2017 | OPNX | NOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION - PROCESSED BY IB | — |
| Mar 15, 2017 | OPNS | NOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION SENT TO IB | — |
| Mar 15, 2017 | OPNR | NOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB | — |
| Feb 13, 2017 | MAB2 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - FAILURE TO RESPOND | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Feb 13, 2017 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Sep 23, 2016 | RFNT | REFUSAL PROCESSED BY IB | — |
| Jul 15, 2016 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jul 15, 2016 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jun 25, 2016 | ACEC | AMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED | — |
| Jun 25, 2016 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jun 24, 2016 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Jun 23, 2016 | ACEC | AMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED | — |
| Jun 23, 2016 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jun 20, 2016 | FAXX | FAX RECEIVED | — |
| Jun 1, 2016 | NAUD | NOTICE OF UNRESPONSIVE AMENDMENT - MAILED | — |
| May 31, 2016 | NAUD | REPORT UNRESPONSIVE AMENDMENT - COMPLETED | — |
| May 10, 2016 | ACEC | AMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED | — |
| May 10, 2016 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| May 2, 2016 | IROA | RESPONSE TO ITU OFFICE ACTION ENTERED | — |
| May 2, 2016 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Apr 27, 2016 | FAXX | FAX RECEIVED | — |
| Apr 18, 2016 | NAUD | NOTICE OF UNRESPONSIVE AMENDMENT - MAILED | — |
| Apr 15, 2016 | NAUD | REPORT UNRESPONSIVE AMENDMENT - COMPLETED | — |
| Mar 24, 2016 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Mar 24, 2016 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Mar 17, 2016 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Mar 4, 2016 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Jan 4, 2016 | RFNT | REFUSAL PROCESSED BY IB | — |
| Dec 17, 2015 | RFCS | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED - REFUSAL SENT TO IB | — |
| Dec 17, 2015 | RFRR | REFUSAL PROCESSED BY MPU | — |
| Dec 16, 2015 | RFCR | NON-FINAL ACTION (IB REFUSAL) PREPARED FOR REVIEW | — |
| Dec 15, 2015 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Dec 10, 2015 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Oct 20, 2015 | MAFR | APPLICATION FILING RECEIPT MAILED | — |
| Oct 16, 2015 | NWOS | NEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED | — |
| Oct 15, 2015 | REPR | SN ASSIGNED FOR SECT 66A APPL FROM IB | — |