USPTO serial 79174002
FLIRTEASE
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Reg. 4916305Status 404
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- Mar 15, 2016
- Examiner
- ZIMMERMAN, GAYNNE
- Law office
- PUBLICATION AND ISSUE SECTION
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with FLIRTEASE?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Nicholas D. Wells
Nicholas D. Wells Legends Law Group330 N. Main St,Kaysville, UT 84037UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 033 | Alcoholic extracts; Alcoholic essences; Alcoholic beverages except beer; Alcoholic beverages containing fruit; Anisette liqueur; Aperitifs; Arak; Brandy; Wine; Kirsch; Vodka; Alcoholic bitters; Distilled spirits; Gin; Digesters, namely, digestif liqueurs and spirits; Prepared alcoholic cocktails; Perry; Curacao; Liqueurs; Mead, namely, hydromel; Peppermint liqueurs; Nira sugar-cane based alcoholic beverages; Rice alcohol; Piquette; Alcoholic fruit extracts; Pre-mixed alcoholic beverages, other than beer-based; Rum; Hard cider; Sake; Spirits; Whisky | SECTION 71 - CANCELLED | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Feb 26, 2026 | DENA | NOTIFICATION OF EFFECT OF CANCELLATION OF INTL REG E-MAILED | — |
| Feb 26, 2026 | DETH | DEATH OF INTERNATIONAL REGISTRATION | — |
| Jul 25, 2023 | INNT | TOTAL INVALIDATION PROCESSED BY THE IB | — |
| Jun 30, 2023 | INTS | TOTAL INVALIDATION OF REG EXT PROTECTION SENT TO IB | — |
| Jun 30, 2023 | INPC | INVALIDATION PROCESSED | — |
| May 30, 2023 | INTR | TOTAL INVALIDATION OF REG EXT PROTECTION CREATED | — |
| Sep 30, 2022 | C71T | CANCELLED SECTION 71 | — |
| Jul 9, 2021 | NREP | NEW REPRESENTATIVE AT IB RECEIVED | — |
| Mar 15, 2021 | REM3 | COURTESY REMINDER - SEC. 71 (6-YR) E-MAILED | — |
| Dec 15, 2016 | ADCH | CHANGE OF NAME/ADDRESS REC'D FROM IB | — |
| Jul 9, 2016 | FINO | FINAL DECISION TRANSACTION PROCESSED BY IB | — |
| Jun 16, 2016 | FICS | FINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE SENT TO IB | — |
| Jun 16, 2016 | FIMP | FINAL DISPOSITION PROCESSED | — |
| Jun 15, 2016 | FICR | FINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB | — |
| Mar 15, 2016 | R.PR | REGISTERED-PRINCIPAL REGISTER | Your trademark is registered on the Principal Register — the strongest form of federal trademark protection. You may use the ® symbol for the covered goods and services. Maintenance filings (Section 8 and renewals) are required to keep the registration alive. |
| Jan 2, 2016 | TCCA | TEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED | — |
| Dec 29, 2015 | NPUB | OFFICIAL GAZETTE PUBLICATION CONFIRMATION E-MAILED | — |
| Dec 29, 2015 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Dec 9, 2015 | NONP | NOTIFICATION OF NOTICE OF PUBLICATION E-MAILED | — |
| Nov 17, 2015 | RFNT | REFUSAL PROCESSED BY IB | — |
| Nov 4, 2015 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Nov 3, 2015 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Nov 3, 2015 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Nov 3, 2015 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Oct 23, 2015 | RFCS | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED - REFUSAL SENT TO IB | — |
| Oct 23, 2015 | RFRR | REFUSAL PROCESSED BY MPU | — |
| Oct 23, 2015 | MAFR | APPLICATION FILING RECEIPT MAILED | — |
| Oct 21, 2015 | RFCR | NON-FINAL ACTION (IB REFUSAL) PREPARED FOR REVIEW | — |
| Oct 20, 2015 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Oct 20, 2015 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Oct 19, 2015 | NWOS | NEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED | — |
| Oct 15, 2015 | REPR | SN ASSIGNED FOR SECT 66A APPL FROM IB | — |