USPTO serial 79174042
SNP SHINING NATURE PURITY
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Reg. 5010188Status 739Renewal
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- Aug 2, 2016
- Examiner
- HUDSON, TAMARA BREE
- Law office
- GENERIC WEB UPDATE
What this means
This registration is in, or will soon enter, a USPTO maintenance window. Missing a Section 8 or Section 9 filing can cancel the registration.
Need help with SNP SHINING NATURE PURITY?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Get help with this Renewal, set up monitoring, or talk with CopyMark.
Get Attorney Assistance for just $399*
Plus Government fees of $850
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Jae Youn Kim
Jae Youn Kim Novick, Kim & Lee, PLLC3251 Old Lee HighwaySuite 500Fairfax, VA 22030Goods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 003 | Cosmetics; functional cosmetics; anti-aging cosmetics; body and beauty care cosmetics; cosmetic preparations for skin treatment; cosmetic preparations for skin care; cosmetic products for the face and body; cleaning pads impregnated with cosmetics; beauty care preparations, namely, body lotion, body cream, body oil, body masks; mask pack for cosmetic purposes; non-medicated toilet preparations, namely, skin care preparations, hair care preparations, scalp care preparations, nail care preparations; sun block preparations; exfoliating creams; cosmetics in the nature of depilatory products; baby lotion; baby cream; cosmetics in the nature of pore-tightening packs for use on the skin; cosmetic preparations for baths and shower; make-up cosmetics; facial washes | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
- Other trademarks owned by SD BIOTECHNOLOGY CO., LTD.
- Other trademarks owned by SD Biotechnologies co., Ltd
- Other trademarks owned by SD BIOTECHNOLOGY CO., LTD.
- Other trademarks in Class 003
- Similar marks named SNP SHINING NATURE PURITY
- Recently changed USPTO trademarks
- Recently filed trademarks
- Browse all trademark records
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sep 3, 2026 | NREP | NEW REPRESENTATIVE AT IB RECEIVED | — |
| Aug 2, 2025 | REM4 | COURTESY REMINDER - SEC. 71 (10-YR) E-MAILED | — |
| Mar 6, 2025 | RNWL | INTERNATIONAL REGISTRATION RENEWED | — |
| Feb 16, 2024 | NREP | NEW REPRESENTATIVE AT IB RECEIVED | — |
| May 20, 2023 | NA75 | NOTICE OF ACCEPTANCE OF SEC. 71 & 15 - E-MAILED | — |
| May 20, 2023 | C75A | REGISTERED - SEC. 71 ACCEPTED & SEC. 15 ACK. | — |
| May 20, 2023 | APRE | CASE ASSIGNED TO POST REGISTRATION PARALEGAL | — |
| Nov 2, 2022 | ES75 | TEAS SECTION 71 & 15 RECEIVED | — |
| Feb 5, 2022 | NREP | NEW REPRESENTATIVE AT IB RECEIVED | — |
| Feb 5, 2022 | NREP | NEW REPRESENTATIVE AT IB RECEIVED | — |
| Sep 2, 2021 | CHAN | APPLICANT/CORRESPONDENCE CHANGES (NON-RESPONSIVE) ENTERED | — |
| Sep 2, 2021 | TCCA | TEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED | — |
| Sep 2, 2021 | ECDR | TEAS CHANGE OF DOMESTIC REPRESENTATIVES ADDRESS | — |
| Sep 2, 2021 | ARAA | ATTORNEY/DOM.REP.REVOKED AND/OR APPOINTED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Sep 2, 2021 | REAP | TEAS REVOKE/APP/CHANGE ADDR OF ATTY/DOM REP RECEIVED | — |
| Sep 2, 2021 | COAR | TEAS CHANGE OF OWNER ADDRESS RECEIVED | — |
| Aug 2, 2021 | REM3 | COURTESY REMINDER - SEC. 71 (6-YR) E-MAILED | — |
| Dec 18, 2020 | ADCH | CHANGE OF NAME/ADDRESS REC'D FROM IB | — |
| Jun 14, 2018 | ADCH | CHANGE OF NAME/ADDRESS REC'D FROM IB | — |
| May 5, 2017 | FINO | FINAL DECISION TRANSACTION PROCESSED BY IB | — |
| Dec 13, 2016 | FICS | FINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE SENT TO IB | — |
| Dec 13, 2016 | FIMP | FINAL DISPOSITION PROCESSED | — |
| Nov 2, 2016 | FICR | FINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB | — |
| Aug 2, 2016 | R.PR | REGISTERED-PRINCIPAL REGISTER | Your trademark is registered on the Principal Register — the strongest form of federal trademark protection. You may use the ® symbol for the covered goods and services. Maintenance filings (Section 8 and renewals) are required to keep the registration alive. |
| May 17, 2016 | NPUB | OFFICIAL GAZETTE PUBLICATION CONFIRMATION E-MAILED | — |
| May 17, 2016 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Apr 27, 2016 | NONP | NOTIFICATION OF NOTICE OF PUBLICATION E-MAILED | — |
| Apr 7, 2016 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Mar 25, 2016 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Mar 24, 2016 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Mar 24, 2016 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Mar 24, 2016 | ARAA | ATTORNEY/DOM.REP.REVOKED AND/OR APPOINTED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Mar 24, 2016 | REAP | TEAS REVOKE/APP/CHANGE ADDR OF ATTY/DOM REP RECEIVED | — |
| Nov 17, 2015 | RFNT | REFUSAL PROCESSED BY IB | — |
| Oct 28, 2015 | RFCS | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED - REFUSAL SENT TO IB | — |
| Oct 28, 2015 | RFRR | REFUSAL PROCESSED BY MPU | — |
| Oct 23, 2015 | RFCR | NON-FINAL ACTION (IB REFUSAL) PREPARED FOR REVIEW | — |
| Oct 23, 2015 | MAFR | APPLICATION FILING RECEIPT MAILED | — |
| Oct 22, 2015 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Oct 19, 2015 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Oct 19, 2015 | NWOS | NEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED | — |
| Oct 15, 2015 | REPR | SN ASSIGNED FOR SECT 66A APPL FROM IB | — |