Drawing for SNEAKY

USPTO serial 79174054

SNEAKY

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Reg. 4971114Status 706Renewal
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
Jun 7, 2016
Examiner
BAKER, JORDAN A
Law office
GENERIC WEB UPDATE

What this means

This registration is in, or will soon enter, a USPTO maintenance window. Missing a Section 8 or Section 9 filing can cancel the registration.

Need help with SNEAKY?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Get help with this Renewal, set up monitoring, or talk with CopyMark.
Get Attorney Assistance for just $1,097*

Plus Government fees of $2,550

Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

Ryan A Bethell

Ryan A Bethell The Ideas Law Firm, PLLC975 E Dava DriveTempe, AZ 85283United States

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
001Waterproofing shoe spraysACTIVE—
003Shoe cream; shoe polish; shoe polishes; shoe wax; shoe and boot cream; shoe and boot polish; foot deodorant spray; spray cleaners for cleaning and polishing shoes; pre-moistened wipes namely impregnated with cleaning compounds for use on shoesACTIVE—
021Shoe brushes; shoe horns; shoe stretchers; shoe trees; cloths for polishing shoes; shoe shine cloths; cleaning cloths; microfibre cloths for cleaning; horsehair for brushes; cleaning wipes, namely, non-woven disposable textile wipes not impregnated with chemical, for use on shoesACTIVE—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Jun 8, 2025REM4COURTESY REMINDER - SEC. 71 (10-YR) E-MAILED—
Mar 27, 2025RNWLINTERNATIONAL REGISTRATION RENEWED—
Oct 12, 2023TCCATEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED—
Oct 12, 2023ARAAATTORNEY/DOM.REP.REVOKED AND/OR APPOINTEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Oct 12, 2023REAPTEAS REVOKE/APP/CHANGE ADDR OF ATTY/DOM REP RECEIVED—
Jun 28, 2023NA71NOTICE OF ACCEPTANCE OF SEC. 71 - E-MAILED—
Jun 28, 202371AGREGISTERED-SEC.71 ACCEPTED—
Jun 27, 2023APRECASE ASSIGNED TO POST REGISTRATION PARALEGAL—
Dec 7, 2022ES71TEAS SECTION 71 RECEIVED—
Oct 2, 2016FINOFINAL DECISION TRANSACTION PROCESSED BY IB—
Sep 12, 2016FICSFINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE SENT TO IB—
Sep 12, 2016FIMPFINAL DISPOSITION PROCESSED—
Sep 7, 2016FICRFINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB—
Jun 7, 2016R.PRREGISTERED-PRINCIPAL REGISTERYour trademark is registered on the Principal Register — the strongest form of federal trademark protection. You may use the ® symbol for the covered goods and services. Maintenance filings (Section 8 and renewals) are required to keep the registration alive.
Mar 22, 2016PUBOPUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITIONYour mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance.
Mar 18, 2016GPNXNOTIFICATION PROCESSED BY IB—
Mar 2, 2016OPNSNOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION SENT TO IB—
Mar 2, 2016OP2RNOTICE OF START OF OPPOSITION PERIOD CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB—
Mar 2, 2016NPUBNOTICE OF PUBLICATION—
Feb 11, 2016CNEAEXAMINERS AMENDMENT MAILED—
Feb 11, 2016CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER—
Feb 11, 2016XAECEXAMINER'S AMENDMENT ENTERED—
Feb 11, 2016CNEAEXAMINERS AMENDMENT -WRITTEN—
Feb 5, 2016TEMETEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED—
Feb 5, 2016CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Feb 5, 2016TROATEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Nov 8, 2015RFNPREFUSAL PROCESSED BY IB—
Oct 23, 2015MAFRAPPLICATION FILING RECEIPT MAILED—
Oct 21, 2015RFCSNON-FINAL ACTION MAILED - REFUSAL SENT TO IB—
Oct 21, 2015RFRRREFUSAL PROCESSED BY MPU—
Oct 20, 2015RFCRNON-FINAL ACTION (IB REFUSAL) PREPARED FOR REVIEW—
Oct 19, 2015CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Oct 19, 2015DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Oct 19, 2015NWOSNEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED—
Oct 15, 2015REPRSN ASSIGNED FOR SECT 66A APPL FROM IB—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance