USPTO serial 79174275
DYNAPELLETPRESS
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Status 402
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- PARADEWELAI, BENJI YUEN
- Law office
- TMEG LAW OFFICE 101 - EXAMINING ATTORNEY ASSIGNED
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with DYNAPELLETPRESS?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Goods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 007 | Machines for industrial purposes, namely, presses; machines for industrial purposes, namely, presses for the continuous extrusion of sawdust and wood particle based semi-finished products; extrusion molding machines; machines for the formation of wood pellets; plants for the formation of wood pellets; woodworking machines and machine tools | SECTION 70 - CANCELLED | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Aug 22, 2025 | DETH | DEATH OF INTERNATIONAL REGISTRATION | — |
| May 13, 2022 | NREP | NEW REPRESENTATIVE AT IB RECEIVED | — |
| Jun 23, 2017 | FINT | FINAL DECISION TRANSACTION PROCESSED BY IB | — |
| Jun 6, 2017 | FICS | FINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE SENT TO IB | — |
| Jun 6, 2017 | FICR | FINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB | — |
| Apr 1, 2017 | OPNX | NOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION - PROCESSED BY IB | — |
| Mar 15, 2017 | OPNS | NOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION SENT TO IB | — |
| Mar 15, 2017 | OPNR | NOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB | — |
| Jun 6, 2016 | MAB2 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - FAILURE TO RESPOND | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Jun 6, 2016 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Nov 17, 2015 | RFNT | REFUSAL PROCESSED BY IB | — |
| Oct 26, 2015 | RFCS | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED - REFUSAL SENT TO IB | — |
| Oct 26, 2015 | RFRR | REFUSAL PROCESSED BY MPU | — |
| Oct 24, 2015 | MAFR | APPLICATION FILING RECEIPT MAILED | — |
| Oct 23, 2015 | RFCR | NON-FINAL ACTION (IB REFUSAL) PREPARED FOR REVIEW | — |
| Oct 22, 2015 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Oct 20, 2015 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Oct 20, 2015 | NWOS | NEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED | — |
| Oct 16, 2015 | LIMI | LIMITATION FROM ORIGINAL APPLICATION ENTERED | — |
| Oct 15, 2015 | REPR | SN ASSIGNED FOR SECT 66A APPL FROM IB | — |