Drawing for MM MERCATO METROPOLITANO

USPTO serial 79174293

MM MERCATO METROPOLITANO

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 402
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
TWOHIG, SHANNON MARIE
Law office
TMO LAW OFFICE 121

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with MM MERCATO METROPOLITANO?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

David J. Diamond

David J. Diamond Richard Law Group, Inc.8411 Preston RoadSuite 890Dallas, TX 75225

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
043Services for providing food and drink; carry-out restaurants; self-service restaurants; fast food restaurant services; carvery restaurant services; restaurant services incorporating licensed bar facilitiesABANDONED—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Jan 15, 2026DENANOTIFICATION OF EFFECT OF CANCELLATION OF INTL REG E-MAILED—
Jan 15, 2026DETHDEATH OF INTERNATIONAL REGISTRATION—
Nov 19, 2022NREPNEW REPRESENTATIVE AT IB RECEIVED—
Apr 29, 2022NREPNEW REPRESENTATIVE AT IB RECEIVED—
Oct 5, 2018NREPNEW REPRESENTATIVE AT IB RECEIVED—
May 25, 2018FINTFINAL DECISION TRANSACTION PROCESSED BY IB—
Apr 18, 2018FICSFINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE SENT TO IB—
Apr 18, 2018FICRFINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB—
Apr 18, 2017MAB5ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - AFTER PUBLICATION—
Apr 18, 2017ABN5ABANDONMENT - AFTER PUBLICATION—
Apr 14, 2017EXARTEAS EXPRESS ABANDONMENT RECEIVED—
Apr 1, 2017OPNXNOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION - PROCESSED BY IB—
Mar 15, 2017OPNSNOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION SENT TO IB—
Mar 15, 2017OPNRNOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB—
Mar 9, 2017ETOFEXTENSION OF TIME TO OPPOSE RECEIVED—
Feb 28, 2017NPUBOFFICIAL GAZETTE PUBLICATION CONFIRMATION E-MAILED—
Feb 28, 2017PUBOPUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITIONYour mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance.
Feb 24, 2017GPNXNOTIFICATION PROCESSED BY IB—
Feb 8, 2017OPNSNOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION SENT TO IB—
Feb 8, 2017OP2RNOTICE OF START OF OPPOSITION PERIOD CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB—
Feb 8, 2017NONPNOTIFICATION OF NOTICE OF PUBLICATION E-MAILED—
Jan 17, 2017CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER—
Jan 16, 2017TEMETEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED—
Jan 16, 2017CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Jan 16, 2017TROATEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Jan 13, 2017GNRNNOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Jan 13, 2017GNRTNON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Jan 13, 2017CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Dec 20, 2016XAECEXAMINER'S AMENDMENT ENTERED—
Dec 20, 2016GNENNOTIFICATION OF EXAMINERS AMENDMENT E-MAILED—
Dec 20, 2016GNEAEXAMINERS AMENDMENT E-MAILED—
Dec 20, 2016CNEAEXAMINERS AMENDMENT -WRITTEN—
May 26, 2016ADCHCHANGE OF NAME/ADDRESS REC'D FROM IB—
May 20, 2016GNFNNOTIFICATION OF FINAL REFUSAL EMAILED—
May 20, 2016GNFRFINAL REFUSAL E-MAILEDA final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon.
May 20, 2016CNFRFINAL REFUSAL WRITTENA final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon.
Apr 19, 2016TEMETEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED—
Apr 14, 2016CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Apr 14, 2016TROATEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Nov 17, 2015RFNTREFUSAL PROCESSED BY IB—
Nov 15, 2015CHLDCHANGE OF OWNER RECEIVED FROM IB—
Oct 24, 2015MAFRAPPLICATION FILING RECEIPT MAILED—
Oct 23, 2015RFCSNON-FINAL ACTION MAILED - REFUSAL SENT TO IB—
Oct 23, 2015RFRRREFUSAL PROCESSED BY MPU—
Oct 22, 2015RFCRNON-FINAL ACTION (IB REFUSAL) PREPARED FOR REVIEW—
Oct 21, 2015CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Oct 20, 2015DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Oct 20, 2015NWOSNEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED—
Oct 15, 2015REPRSN ASSIGNED FOR SECT 66A APPL FROM IB—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance