Drawing for LOGICOM

USPTO serial 79174396

LOGICOM

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 402
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
GILLES,DEBORAH LYNN MEINERS
Law office
TMO LAW OFFICE 110 - EXAMINING ATTORNEY ASSIGNED

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with LOGICOM?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

Julie B. Seyler

Julie B. Seyler ABELMAN FRAYNE & SCHWAB666 Third AvenueNY, NY 10017UNITED STATES

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
009Portable and mobile digital electronic devices for sending and receiving telephone calls, electronic mail, messaging, video, music, audiovisual content and other multimedia content and other digital data; multimedia tablet computers; MP3 and MP4 players; digital video recorders and players; digital versatile disc recorders and players; cordless telephones; mobile telephones; parts and accessories for mobile telephones, namely, belt clips; mobile telephone cases; cases for mobile telephones; dry cells and batteries; rechargeable electric batteries; chargers for batteries; apparatus for charging electric accumulators, namely, charging stations for charging electric vehicles; earphones; stereo earphones; ear phones to be placed in the ears; car telephones, smartphones, answering machines, wireless communication devices for voice, data or images transmission; software for global positioning systems (GPS) for tracking people; smartphones in the form of watches; smartphones in the form of bracelets; portable computer peripherals; personal electronic modules that are wearable and interchangeable, namely "radio frequency identification (RFID) tags for personal mobile telephones, telephones, smartphones, tablet computers, portable and handheld digital electronic devices fitted with wireless communication functions; mobile electronic data receivers and telephone transmittersSECTION 70 - CANCELLED—
014Smart watches comprised primarily of a wristwatch and also featuring a telephone, software and display screens for viewing, sending and receiving texts, emails, videos, music, data and information; watches; watch cases being parts of watches; timepieces; watch straps; braceletsSECTION 70 - CANCELLED—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Jan 8, 2026DENANOTIFICATION OF EFFECT OF CANCELLATION OF INTL REG E-MAILED—
Jan 8, 2026DETHDEATH OF INTERNATIONAL REGISTRATION—
Jul 13, 2018FINTFINAL DECISION TRANSACTION PROCESSED BY IB—
Jun 11, 2018FICSFINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE SENT TO IB—
Jun 11, 2018FICRFINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB—
Jun 12, 2017MAB2ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - FAILURE TO RESPONDThe trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time.
Jun 11, 2017ABN2ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSEThe trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time.
Apr 1, 2017OPNXNOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION - PROCESSED BY IB—
Mar 15, 2017OPNSNOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION SENT TO IB—
Mar 15, 2017OPNRNOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB—
Nov 12, 2016GNS1NOTIFICATION OF SUBSEQUENT FINAL EMAILED—
Nov 12, 2016GNSFSUBSEQUENT FINAL EMAILED—
Nov 12, 2016CFRCSUBSEQUENT FINAL REFUSAL WRITTEN—
Nov 1, 2016GNFNNOTIFICATION OF FINAL REFUSAL EMAILED—
Nov 1, 2016GNFRFINAL REFUSAL E-MAILEDA final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon.
Nov 1, 2016CNFRFINAL REFUSAL WRITTENA final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon.
Oct 10, 2016TEMETEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED—
Oct 10, 2016CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Oct 10, 2016TROATEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Apr 11, 2016GNRNNOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Apr 11, 2016GNRTNON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Apr 11, 2016CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Mar 21, 2016ARAAATTORNEY/DOM.REP.REVOKED AND/OR APPOINTEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Mar 21, 2016REAPTEAS REVOKE/APP/CHANGE ADDR OF ATTY/DOM REP RECEIVED—
Mar 21, 2016TCCATEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED—
Mar 21, 2016TEMETEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED—
Mar 21, 2016CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Mar 21, 2016TROATEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Nov 21, 2015RFNTREFUSAL PROCESSED BY IB—
Oct 30, 2015RFCSNON-FINAL ACTION MAILED - REFUSAL SENT TO IB—
Oct 30, 2015RFRRREFUSAL PROCESSED BY MPU—
Oct 28, 2015RFCRNON-FINAL ACTION (IB REFUSAL) PREPARED FOR REVIEW—
Oct 27, 2015CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Oct 24, 2015MAFRAPPLICATION FILING RECEIPT MAILED—
Oct 20, 2015DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Oct 20, 2015NWOSNEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED—
Oct 15, 2015REPRSN ASSIGNED FOR SECT 66A APPL FROM IB—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance