Drawing for BIFLEX

USPTO serial 79174676

BIFLEX

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 402
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
MAYER, DAVID COREY
Law office
TMO LAW OFFICE 121 - EXAMINING ATTORNEY ASSIGNED

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with BIFLEX?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
010Medical and surgical instruments, namely, ureteral access sheathSECTION 70 - CANCELLED—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Oct 8, 2024DETHDEATH OF INTERNATIONAL REGISTRATION—
Oct 7, 2024DETHDEATH OF INTERNATIONAL REGISTRATION—
Oct 7, 2024DETHDEATH OF INTERNATIONAL REGISTRATION—
Oct 7, 2024DETHDEATH OF INTERNATIONAL REGISTRATION—
Oct 7, 2024DETHDEATH OF INTERNATIONAL REGISTRATION—
Oct 7, 2024DETHDEATH OF INTERNATIONAL REGISTRATION—
Oct 7, 2024DETHDEATH OF INTERNATIONAL REGISTRATION—
Oct 7, 2024DETHDEATH OF INTERNATIONAL REGISTRATION—
Oct 7, 2024DETHDEATH OF INTERNATIONAL REGISTRATION—
Oct 7, 2024DETHDEATH OF INTERNATIONAL REGISTRATION—
Oct 7, 2024DETHDEATH OF INTERNATIONAL REGISTRATION—
Aug 4, 2017FINTFINAL DECISION TRANSACTION PROCESSED BY IB—
Jul 19, 2017FICSFINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE SENT TO IB—
Jul 19, 2017FICRFINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB—
Apr 8, 2017OPNXNOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION - PROCESSED BY IB—
Mar 22, 2017OPNSNOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION SENT TO IB—
Mar 22, 2017OPNRNOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB—
Feb 23, 2017NREPNEW REPRESENTATIVE AT IB RECEIVED—
Dec 16, 2016NREPNEW REPRESENTATIVE AT IB RECEIVED—
Jul 19, 2016MAB2ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - FAILURE TO RESPONDThe trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time.
Jul 19, 2016ABN2ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSEThe trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time.
Jul 18, 2016DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Dec 11, 2015RFNTREFUSAL PROCESSED BY IB—
Nov 24, 2015RFCSNON-FINAL ACTION MAILED - REFUSAL SENT TO IB—
Nov 24, 2015RFRRREFUSAL PROCESSED BY MPU—
Nov 21, 2015RFCRNON-FINAL ACTION (IB REFUSAL) PREPARED FOR REVIEW—
Nov 20, 2015CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Nov 16, 2015DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Oct 27, 2015MAFRAPPLICATION FILING RECEIPT MAILED—
Oct 23, 2015NWOSNEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED—
Oct 22, 2015REPRSN ASSIGNED FOR SECT 66A APPL FROM IB—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance