Drawing for CENTRALWAY SANDBOX

USPTO serial 79174844

CENTRALWAY SANDBOX

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 402
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
CRENNAN, KEVIN GERARD
Law office
TMO LAW OFFICE 113 - EXAMINING ATTORNEY ASSIGNED

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with CENTRALWAY SANDBOX?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
035Advertising; business consultation; business administration and business management consultation; providing office functions; establishing networks of commercial and strategic partners, namely, business networking services, business networking services via online portal and mobile application, business networking services in the nature of arranging contacts between commercial and strategic industry partnersSECTION 70 - CANCELLED—
036Insurance services; financial affairs, namely, financial services, and financial consultancy; monetary affairs and services; real estate affairs and servicesSECTION 70 - CANCELLED—
041Education services, namely, providing seminars, workshops, and mentoring in the field of leadership development, improving creative ability and idea generation, strategic and operational planning; training, namely, business and leadership training; organizing community sporting and cultural eventsSECTION 70 - CANCELLED—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Feb 12, 2026DENANOTIFICATION OF EFFECT OF CANCELLATION OF INTL REG E-MAILED—
Feb 12, 2026DETHDEATH OF INTERNATIONAL REGISTRATION—
Jan 29, 2026DENANOTIFICATION OF EFFECT OF CANCELLATION OF INTL REG E-MAILED—
Jan 29, 2026DETHDEATH OF INTERNATIONAL REGISTRATION—
Feb 23, 2024NREPNEW REPRESENTATIVE AT IB RECEIVED—
Aug 31, 2018FINTFINAL DECISION TRANSACTION PROCESSED BY IB—
Aug 6, 2018FICSFINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE SENT TO IB—
Aug 4, 2018FICRFINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB—
Aug 4, 2017MAB2ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - FAILURE TO RESPONDThe trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time.
Aug 4, 2017ABN2ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSEThe trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time.
Apr 8, 2017OPNXNOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION - PROCESSED BY IB—
Mar 22, 2017OPNSNOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION SENT TO IB—
Mar 22, 2017OPNRNOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB—
Mar 17, 2017RFNTREFUSAL PROCESSED BY IB—
Jan 6, 2017GNRNNOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Jan 6, 2017GNRTNON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Jan 6, 2017CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Dec 12, 2016RCCKSUSPENSION CHECKED - TO ATTORNEY FOR ACTION—
Dec 10, 2016ALIEASSIGNED TO LIE—
Nov 3, 2016NREPNEW REPRESENTATIVE AT IB RECEIVED—
Aug 18, 2016NREPNEW REPRESENTATIVE AT IB RECEIVED—
Jul 7, 2016CHLDCHANGE OF OWNER RECEIVED FROM IB—
May 27, 2016GNS3NOTIFICATION OF LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED—
May 27, 2016GNSLLETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED—
May 27, 2016CNSLSUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN—
May 3, 2016TEMETEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED—
May 2, 2016CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
May 2, 2016TROATEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Nov 21, 2015RFNTREFUSAL PROCESSED BY IB—
Nov 2, 2015RFCSNON-FINAL ACTION MAILED - REFUSAL SENT TO IB—
Nov 2, 2015RFRRREFUSAL PROCESSED BY MPU—
Oct 30, 2015MAFRAPPLICATION FILING RECEIPT MAILED—
Oct 28, 2015RFCRNON-FINAL ACTION (IB REFUSAL) PREPARED FOR REVIEW—
Oct 27, 2015CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Oct 26, 2015DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Oct 26, 2015NWOSNEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED—
Oct 22, 2015REPRSN ASSIGNED FOR SECT 66A APPL FROM IB—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance