Drawing for SAINTEM

USPTO serial 79175371

SAINTEM

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 402
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
CHARLON, BARNEY
Law office
TMEG LAW OFFICE 104 - EXAMINING ATTORNEY ASSIGNED

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with SAINTEM?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
033Wines with the Protected Designation of Origin of SAINT EMILIONSECTION 70 - CANCELLED—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Mar 12, 2026DETHDEATH OF INTERNATIONAL REGISTRATION—
Dec 29, 2017FINTFINAL DECISION TRANSACTION PROCESSED BY IB—
Dec 11, 2017FICSFINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE SENT TO IB—
Dec 9, 2017FICRFINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB—
Oct 6, 2017NREPNEW REPRESENTATIVE AT IB RECEIVED—
Apr 14, 2017OPNXNOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION - PROCESSED BY IB—
Mar 29, 2017OPNSNOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION SENT TO IB—
Mar 29, 2017OPNRNOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB—
Dec 9, 2016MAB2ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - FAILURE TO RESPONDThe trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time.
Dec 9, 2016ABN2ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSEThe trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time.
May 13, 2016CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
May 12, 2016CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Apr 13, 2016TEMETEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED—
Apr 13, 2016CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Apr 1, 2016ALIEASSIGNED TO LIE—
Mar 23, 2016TROATEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Jan 8, 2016RFNTREFUSAL PROCESSED BY IB—
Dec 18, 2015RFCSNON-FINAL ACTION MAILED - REFUSAL SENT TO IB—
Dec 18, 2015RFRRREFUSAL PROCESSED BY MPU—
Dec 18, 2015RFCRNON-FINAL ACTION (IB REFUSAL) PREPARED FOR REVIEW—
Dec 17, 2015CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Dec 9, 2015DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Nov 10, 2015MAFRAPPLICATION FILING RECEIPT MAILED—
Nov 5, 2015NWOSNEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED—
Oct 29, 2015REPRSN ASSIGNED FOR SECT 66A APPL FROM IB—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance