Drawing for DAIKI

USPTO serial 79175393

DAIKI

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Reg. 5430346Status 739Registered
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
Mar 27, 2018
Examiner
SINGH, TEJBIR
Law office
GENERIC WEB UPDATE

What this means

This trademark is registered with the USPTO. Monitoring new filings can help you catch lookalike marks early.

Need help with DAIKI?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

Marcus P. Dolce

Marcus P. Dolce Flynn Thiel, P.C.2026 Rambling RoadKALAMAZOO, MI 49008-1631UNITED STATES

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
009Measuring or testing machines and instruments, namely, soil moisture meters, tensiometers for measuring soil moisture tension, soil resistance meters, soil hardness testing equipment in the nature of penetrometers, soil hardness meters, soil crust hardness meters, cation exchange capacity meters for soil, and total petroleum hydrocarbon meters for soilACTIVE—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Jun 26, 2025NREPNEW REPRESENTATIVE AT IB RECEIVED—
Nov 22, 2023NA75NOTICE OF ACCEPTANCE OF SEC. 71 & 15 - E-MAILED—
Nov 22, 2023C75AREGISTERED - SEC. 71 ACCEPTED & SEC. 15 ACK.—
Nov 21, 2023APRECASE ASSIGNED TO POST REGISTRATION PARALEGAL—
Apr 14, 2023ES75TEAS SECTION 71 & 15 RECEIVED—
Mar 27, 2023REM3COURTESY REMINDER - SEC. 71 (6-YR) E-MAILED—
May 9, 2019RNWLINTERNATIONAL REGISTRATION RENEWED—
Jul 27, 2018FINOFINAL DECISION TRANSACTION PROCESSED BY IB—
Jun 29, 2018FICSFINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE SENT TO IB—
Jun 29, 2018FIMPFINAL DISPOSITION PROCESSED—
Jun 27, 2018FICRFINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB—
Mar 27, 2018R.PRREGISTERED-PRINCIPAL REGISTERYour trademark is registered on the Principal Register — the strongest form of federal trademark protection. You may use the ® symbol for the covered goods and services. Maintenance filings (Section 8 and renewals) are required to keep the registration alive.
Feb 9, 2018GPNXNOTIFICATION PROCESSED BY IB—
Jan 9, 2018NPUBOFFICIAL GAZETTE PUBLICATION CONFIRMATION E-MAILED—
Jan 9, 2018PUBOPUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITIONYour mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance.
Dec 20, 2017OPNSNOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION SENT TO IB—
Dec 20, 2017OP2RNOTICE OF START OF OPPOSITION PERIOD CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB—
Dec 20, 2017NONPNOTIFICATION OF NOTICE OF PUBLICATION E-MAILED—
Nov 29, 2017ALIEASSIGNED TO LIE—
Nov 21, 2017CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER—
Nov 20, 2017EXPTEXPARTE APPEAL TERMINATED—
Jun 7, 2017EXPAEX PARTE APPEAL-REFUSAL AFFIRMED—
Apr 14, 2017OPNXNOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION - PROCESSED BY IB—
Mar 29, 2017OPNSNOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION SENT TO IB—
Mar 29, 2017OPNRNOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB—
Mar 16, 2017GNSNNOTIFICATION OF EXAMINERS STATEMENT E-MAILED—
Mar 16, 2017GNESEXAMINERS STATEMENT E-MAILED—
Mar 16, 2017CNESEXAMINERS STATEMENT - COMPLETED—
Feb 14, 2017JURTJURISDICTION RESTORED TO EXAMINING ATTORNEY—
Dec 8, 2016GEA1NOTIFICATION OF ACTION DENYING REQ FOR RECON E-MAILED—
Dec 8, 2016GECDACTION DENYING REQ FOR RECON E-MAILED—
Dec 8, 2016CNCFACTION CONTINUING FINAL - COMPLETED—
Nov 7, 2016EXPIEX PARTE APPEAL-INSTITUTED—
Nov 7, 2016JURTJURISDICTION RESTORED TO EXAMINING ATTORNEY—
Nov 7, 2016EXAFEXPARTE APPEAL RECEIVED AT TTAB—
Oct 18, 2016TEMETEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED—
Oct 18, 2016CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Oct 18, 2016ERFRTEAS REQUEST FOR RECONSIDERATION RECEIVED—
Sep 15, 2016RDX3NOTIFICATION FOR REQ FOR RECON DENIED NO APPEAL FILED—
Sep 15, 2016RDX1ACTION FOR REQ FOR RECON DENIED NO APPEAL FILED E-MAILED—
Sep 15, 2016RRDXACTION REQ FOR RECON DENIED NO APPEAL FILED COUNTED NOT MAILED—
Aug 26, 2016TEMETEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED—
Aug 25, 2016CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Aug 25, 2016ERFRTEAS REQUEST FOR RECONSIDERATION RECEIVED—
May 6, 2016GNFNNOTIFICATION OF FINAL REFUSAL EMAILED—
May 6, 2016GNFRFINAL REFUSAL E-MAILEDA final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon.
May 6, 2016CNFRFINAL REFUSAL WRITTENA final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon.
May 5, 2016TEMETEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED—
May 4, 2016CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
May 4, 2016TROATEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Mar 25, 2016GNRNNOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Mar 25, 2016GNRTNON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Mar 25, 2016CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Mar 15, 2016TEMETEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED—
Mar 15, 2016CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Mar 8, 2016ALIEASSIGNED TO LIE—
Feb 26, 2016TROATEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Nov 27, 2015RFNTREFUSAL PROCESSED BY IB—
Nov 10, 2015MAFRAPPLICATION FILING RECEIPT MAILED—
Nov 9, 2015RFCSNON-FINAL ACTION MAILED - REFUSAL SENT TO IB—
Nov 9, 2015RFRRREFUSAL PROCESSED BY MPU—
Nov 6, 2015RFCRNON-FINAL ACTION (IB REFUSAL) PREPARED FOR REVIEW—
Nov 5, 2015CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Nov 5, 2015DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Nov 5, 2015NWOSNEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED—
Oct 29, 2015SDRCSN ASSIGNED FOR SECT 66A SUBSEQ DESIG FROM IB—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance