Drawing for GOLDEN CROWN

USPTO serial 79175487

GOLDEN CROWN

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 402
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
Examiner
BHANOT, KAPIL KUMAR
Law office
TMEG LAW OFFICE 108 - EXAMINING ATTORNEY ASSIGNED

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with GOLDEN CROWN?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

Alex Patel

Alex Patel Patel & Almeida, P.C.16830 Ventura Blvd., Suite 360Encino, CA 91436UNITED STATES

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
012Tires for vehicle wheels; tires for bicycles and cycles; casings for pneumatic tires; pneumatic tires for automobiles; tires for automobiles; inner tubes for bicycles and cyclesSECTION 70 - CANCELLED

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Mar 5, 2026DENANOTIFICATION OF EFFECT OF CANCELLATION OF INTL REG E-MAILED
Mar 5, 2026DETHDEATH OF INTERNATIONAL REGISTRATION
Dec 22, 2023NREPNEW REPRESENTATIVE AT IB RECEIVED
Apr 2, 2021NREPNEW REPRESENTATIVE AT IB RECEIVED
Jul 5, 2019FINTFINAL DECISION TRANSACTION PROCESSED BY IB
Jun 18, 2019FICSFINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE SENT TO IB
Jun 18, 2019FICRFINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB
Jun 18, 2018MAB2ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - FAILURE TO RESPONDThe trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time.
Jun 18, 2018ABN2ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSEThe trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time.
Nov 16, 2017GNS1NOTIFICATION OF SUBSEQUENT FINAL EMAILED
Nov 16, 2017GNSFSUBSEQUENT FINAL EMAILED
Nov 16, 2017CFRCSUBSEQUENT FINAL REFUSAL WRITTEN
Nov 8, 2017RCCKSUSPENSION CHECKED - TO ATTORNEY FOR ACTION
May 8, 2017RCSCREPORT COMPLETED SUSPENSION CHECK CASE STILL SUSPENDED
May 5, 2017ALIEASSIGNED TO LIE
Apr 21, 2017OPNXNOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION - PROCESSED BY IB
Apr 5, 2017OPNSNOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION SENT TO IB
Apr 5, 2017OPNRNOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB
Oct 25, 2016GNS3NOTIFICATION OF LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED
Oct 25, 2016GNSLLETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED
Oct 25, 2016CNSLSUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN
Oct 18, 2016TEMETEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED
Oct 17, 2016CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE
Oct 17, 2016ERFRTEAS REQUEST FOR RECONSIDERATION RECEIVED
Jun 22, 2016GNFNNOTIFICATION OF FINAL REFUSAL EMAILED
Jun 22, 2016GNFRFINAL REFUSAL E-MAILEDA final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon.
Jun 22, 2016CNFRFINAL REFUSAL WRITTENA final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon.
Jun 11, 2016TEMETEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED
Jun 10, 2016CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE
Jun 10, 2016TROATEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Jan 4, 2016RFNTREFUSAL PROCESSED BY IB
Dec 11, 2015RFCSNON-FINAL ACTION MAILED - REFUSAL SENT TO IB
Dec 10, 2015RFRRREFUSAL PROCESSED BY MPU
Dec 10, 2015RFCRNON-FINAL ACTION (IB REFUSAL) PREPARED FOR REVIEW
Dec 9, 2015CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Dec 8, 2015RFWRNON-FINAL ACTION (IB REFUSAL) WITHDRAWN FOR REVIEW
Dec 4, 2015RFCRNON-FINAL ACTION (IB REFUSAL) PREPARED FOR REVIEW
Dec 3, 2015CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Dec 3, 2015RFWRNON-FINAL ACTION (IB REFUSAL) WITHDRAWN FOR REVIEW
Dec 1, 2015RFCRNON-FINAL ACTION (IB REFUSAL) PREPARED FOR REVIEW
Nov 30, 2015CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Nov 30, 2015DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER
Nov 13, 2015MAFRAPPLICATION FILING RECEIPT MAILED
Nov 9, 2015NWOSNEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED
Nov 6, 2015REPRSN ASSIGNED FOR SECT 66A APPL FROM IB

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance