Drawing for PERFORMER

USPTO serial 79175549

PERFORMER

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 402
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
CAHILL, CLARE GALLAGHER
Law office
TMEG LAW OFFICE 104

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with PERFORMER?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
002Color pigments; varnishes; paintings; lacquers; preservatives in the form of coatings used against rust and against deterioration of wood; anti-UV preservatives for wood; dyestuffs; raw natural resins; metals in foil and powder form for painters, decorators, printers and artists; white lead; thinners for colorants; thinners for lacquers; thinners for paints; oils for the preservation of woodSECTION 70 - CANCELLED—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Nov 15, 2025DETHDEATH OF INTERNATIONAL REGISTRATION—
Nov 27, 2020NREPNEW REPRESENTATIVE AT IB RECEIVED—
Oct 16, 2020NREPNEW REPRESENTATIVE AT IB RECEIVED—
Jul 1, 2017FINTFINAL DECISION TRANSACTION PROCESSED BY IB—
Jun 12, 2017FICSFINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE SENT TO IB—
Jun 10, 2017FICRFINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB—
Apr 4, 2017CORNCORRECTION FROM THE IB EXAMINED, NO ACTION IS NEEDED—
Mar 31, 2017RINXUSPTO CORRECTION PROCESSED BY IB—
Mar 31, 2017CRCVCORRECTION TRANSACTION RECEIVED FROM IB—
Jun 10, 2016MAB2ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - FAILURE TO RESPONDThe trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time.
Jun 10, 2016ABN2ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSEThe trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time.
Jan 5, 2016CRSNCORRECTION SENT TO IB—
Jan 5, 2016CRCRCORRECTION CREATED FOR IB—
Nov 27, 2015RFNTREFUSAL PROCESSED BY IB—
Nov 13, 2015MAFRAPPLICATION FILING RECEIPT MAILED—
Nov 12, 2015RFCSNON-FINAL ACTION MAILED - REFUSAL SENT TO IB—
Nov 12, 2015RFRRREFUSAL PROCESSED BY MPU—
Nov 10, 2015RFCRNON-FINAL ACTION (IB REFUSAL) PREPARED FOR REVIEW—
Nov 9, 2015CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Nov 9, 2015DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Nov 9, 2015NWOSNEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED—
Nov 6, 2015REPRSN ASSIGNED FOR SECT 66A APPL FROM IB—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance