USPTO serial 79175789
KIRCHHOFF ECOTEC
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- SEVERSON, JUSTIN
- Law office
- TMO LAW OFFICE 111 - EXAMINING ATTORNEY ASSIGNED
What this means
These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.
Need help with KIRCHHOFF ECOTEC?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Owner
Goods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 007 | Street washing machines, street sweeping machines | ACTIVE | — |
| 012 | Chassis for waste collection vehicles, waste collection vehicles, lifting gears for waste collection vehicles, lifting gears for waste containers, waste collection containers as superstructures of waste collection vehicles, sewer cleaning vehicles, street sprinkler vehicles | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Aug 7, 2025 | RNWL | INTERNATIONAL REGISTRATION RENEWED | — |
| Jan 16, 2025 | ADCH | CHANGE OF NAME/ADDRESS REC'D FROM IB | — |
| Jan 27, 2024 | ADCH | CHANGE OF NAME/ADDRESS REC'D FROM IB | — |
| May 9, 2021 | NREP | NEW REPRESENTATIVE AT IB RECEIVED | — |
| May 9, 2021 | NREP | NEW REPRESENTATIVE AT IB RECEIVED | — |
| Jul 8, 2017 | FINT | FINAL DECISION TRANSACTION PROCESSED BY IB | — |
| Jun 16, 2017 | FICS | FINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE SENT TO IB | — |
| Jun 16, 2017 | FICR | FINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB | — |
| Apr 21, 2017 | OPNX | NOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION - PROCESSED BY IB | — |
| Apr 5, 2017 | OPNS | NOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION SENT TO IB | — |
| Apr 5, 2017 | OPNR | NOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB | — |
| Jun 16, 2016 | MAB2 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - FAILURE TO RESPOND | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Jun 16, 2016 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Dec 4, 2015 | RFNT | REFUSAL PROCESSED BY IB | — |
| Nov 19, 2015 | RFCS | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED - REFUSAL SENT TO IB | — |
| Nov 19, 2015 | RFRR | REFUSAL PROCESSED BY MPU | — |
| Nov 18, 2015 | RFCR | NON-FINAL ACTION (IB REFUSAL) PREPARED FOR REVIEW | — |
| Nov 17, 2015 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Nov 17, 2015 | MAFR | APPLICATION FILING RECEIPT MAILED | — |
| Nov 12, 2015 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Nov 12, 2015 | NWOS | NEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED | — |
| Nov 7, 2015 | REPR | SN ASSIGNED FOR SECT 66A APPL FROM IB | — |