USPTO serial 79175819
DEFTALK
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Status 402
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- STRUCK, ROBERT J
- Law office
- TMEG LAW OFFICE 109 - EXAMINING ATTORNEY ASSIGNED
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with DEFTALK?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Goods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 042 | Analysis and testing services in the field of oil exploitation; computer system analysis; consultancy in the field of architectural design; consultancy in the field of architecture and construction drafting; updating of computer programs; technical project studies; material testing; oil-well testing; textile testing; authenticating works of art; design of packaging and wrapping materials; commercial art design; design of interior decor; bacteriological research; biological research; geological research; cosmetic research; mechanical research; technical research; physics research; chemical research; research in the field of environmental protection; copying of computer software; geological surveys; surveying; analysis for oil research; engineering; installation of computer programs; calibration measuring; computer programming for data processing; data conversion of computer program data or information not physical conversion; conversion of data or documents from physical to electronic media; technical consultancy in the field of energy saving and energy efficiency; advisory services relating to computer software; providing technical advice relating to computers; meteorological information; dress designing; providing search engines for the Internet; rental of web servers; computer rental; rental of computer software; maintenance of computer software; upgrading of computer software; quality control; underwater exploration; urban planning; computer virus protection services; research and development services in the field of chemistry; architectural and engineering services; research and development of new products for others; weather forecasting; computer systems design; industrial design; oil prospecting; hosting computer sites web sites; design and writing of computer software; creating and maintaining web sites for others; topographical surveying; chemical analysis; quality evaluation of wool; quality evaluation of standing timber | SECTION 70 - CANCELLED | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Mar 26, 2026 | DETH | DEATH OF INTERNATIONAL REGISTRATION | — |
| Nov 29, 2019 | CHLD | CHANGE OF OWNER RECEIVED FROM IB | — |
| Aug 4, 2017 | FINT | FINAL DECISION TRANSACTION PROCESSED BY IB | — |
| Jul 20, 2017 | FICS | FINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE SENT TO IB | — |
| Jul 20, 2017 | FICR | FINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB | — |
| Apr 21, 2017 | OPNX | NOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION - PROCESSED BY IB | — |
| Apr 5, 2017 | OPNS | NOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION SENT TO IB | — |
| Apr 5, 2017 | OPNR | NOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB | — |
| Jul 20, 2016 | MAB2 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - FAILURE TO RESPOND | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Jul 20, 2016 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Jan 8, 2016 | RFNT | REFUSAL PROCESSED BY IB | — |
| Dec 21, 2015 | RFCS | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED - REFUSAL SENT TO IB | — |
| Dec 21, 2015 | RFRR | REFUSAL PROCESSED BY MPU | — |
| Dec 19, 2015 | RFCR | NON-FINAL ACTION (IB REFUSAL) PREPARED FOR REVIEW | — |
| Dec 18, 2015 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Dec 18, 2015 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Nov 17, 2015 | MAFR | APPLICATION FILING RECEIPT MAILED | — |
| Nov 12, 2015 | NWOS | NEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED | — |
| Nov 7, 2015 | REPR | SN ASSIGNED FOR SECT 66A APPL FROM IB | — |