Drawing for ROASTMASTER

USPTO serial 79175943

ROASTMASTER

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Reg. 5056749Status 739Renewal
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
Oct 11, 2016
Examiner
SWAIN, MICHELE LYNN
Law office
GENERIC WEB UPDATE

What this means

This registration is in, or will soon enter, a USPTO maintenance window. Missing a Section 8 or Section 9 filing can cancel the registration.

Need help with ROASTMASTER?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Get help with this Renewal, set up monitoring, or talk with CopyMark.
Get Attorney Assistance for just $299*

Plus Government fees of $850

Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

Farzad A. Panjshiri

Farzad A. Panjshiri Cantor Colburn LLP20 Church Street22nd FloorHartford, CT 06103

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
011Industrial ovens for the roasting of coffee beans, cocoa beans and other pieced goods of plant origin, namely, nuts, chicory, small pieces of wood for the wine industryACTIVE—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Feb 26, 2026EWAFTEAS WITHDRAWAL OF ATTORNEY RECEIVED-FIRM RETAINS—
Feb 26, 2026TCCATEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED—
Feb 26, 2026ECDRTEAS CHANGE OF DOMESTIC REPRESENTATIVES ADDRESS—
Feb 26, 2026ARAAATTORNEY/DOM.REP.REVOKED AND/OR APPOINTEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Feb 26, 2026REAPTEAS REVOKE/APP/CHANGE ADDR OF ATTY/DOM REP RECEIVED—
Oct 11, 2025REM4COURTESY REMINDER - SEC. 71 (10-YR) E-MAILED—
Aug 28, 2025RNWLINTERNATIONAL REGISTRATION RENEWED—
Jun 13, 2022NA75NOTICE OF ACCEPTANCE OF SEC. 71 & 15 - E-MAILED—
Jun 13, 2022C75AREGISTERED - SEC. 71 ACCEPTED & SEC. 15 ACK.—
May 10, 2022APRECASE ASSIGNED TO POST REGISTRATION PARALEGAL—
Oct 14, 2021ES75TEAS SECTION 71 & 15 RECEIVED—
Oct 11, 2021REM3COURTESY REMINDER - SEC. 71 (6-YR) E-MAILED—
Jul 19, 2018TCCATEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED—
Jun 23, 2017FINOFINAL DECISION TRANSACTION PROCESSED BY IB—
Feb 13, 2017XXSSGENERIC MADRID TRANSACTION SENT TO IB—
Feb 13, 2017XXCRGENERIC MADRID TRANSACTION CREATED—
Jan 11, 2017FICRFINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB—
Dec 1, 2016CHLDCHANGE OF OWNER RECEIVED FROM IB—
Oct 11, 2016R.PRREGISTERED-PRINCIPAL REGISTERYour trademark is registered on the Principal Register — the strongest form of federal trademark protection. You may use the ® symbol for the covered goods and services. Maintenance filings (Section 8 and renewals) are required to keep the registration alive.
Aug 4, 2016OPNXNOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION - PROCESSED BY IB—
Jul 26, 2016NPUBOFFICIAL GAZETTE PUBLICATION CONFIRMATION E-MAILED—
Jul 26, 2016PUBOPUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITIONYour mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance.
Jul 6, 2016OPNSNOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION SENT TO IB—
Jul 6, 2016OP2RNOTICE OF START OF OPPOSITION PERIOD CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB—
Jul 6, 2016NONPNOTIFICATION OF NOTICE OF PUBLICATION E-MAILED—
Jun 22, 2016CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER—
Jun 1, 2016TEMETEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED—
Jun 1, 2016CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Jun 1, 2016TROATEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Apr 7, 2016NREPNEW REPRESENTATIVE AT IB RECEIVED—
Dec 31, 2015RFNTREFUSAL PROCESSED BY IB—
Dec 8, 2015RFCSNON-FINAL ACTION MAILED - REFUSAL SENT TO IB—
Dec 8, 2015RFRRREFUSAL PROCESSED BY MPU—
Dec 8, 2015RFCRNON-FINAL ACTION (IB REFUSAL) PREPARED FOR REVIEW—
Dec 7, 2015CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Dec 1, 2015DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Nov 21, 2015MAFRAPPLICATION FILING RECEIPT MAILED—
Nov 17, 2015NWOSNEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED—
Nov 16, 2015LIMILIMITATION FROM ORIGINAL APPLICATION ENTERED—
Nov 14, 2015REPRSN ASSIGNED FOR SECT 66A APPL FROM IB—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance