Drawing for OPEXS

USPTO serial 79175985

OPEXS

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Reg. 5111596Status 404
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
Jan 3, 2017
Examiner
EISNACH, MICHAEL PATRICK
Law office
Historical data usage

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with OPEXS?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

Thomas J. Mango

Thomas J. Mango Cantor Colburn LLP20 Church Street22nd FloorHartford, CT 06103

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
009Integrated software intended for technical and operational process control, testing and quality control, and for real time data processing of speeds, vibrations, temperature, noise, industrial robots and automated machines in the industries of metal, pulp and paper, flat glass and synthetic fiber; none of the foregoing including or involving optical scanners, optical character recognition apparatus or software for processing images, graphics and textSECTION 70 - CANCELLED—
042Advisory services in the fields of industrial energy efficiency; provision of technical information in the field of quality control of manufactured goods and raw materials; consultancy services in the fields of quality control and research services relating to the computerised automation of industrial processes in the metal, pulp and paper, flat glass and synthetic fiber industries; none of the foregoing in the fields of the process industries, oil refining, petrochemicals, correctional and detention facilities, food services, laundry services or commissary servicesSECTION 70 - CANCELLED—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Apr 16, 2026DENANOTIFICATION OF EFFECT OF CANCELLATION OF INTL REG E-MAILED—
Apr 16, 2026DETHDEATH OF INTERNATIONAL REGISTRATION—
Mar 7, 2026REM4COURTESY REMINDER - SEC. 71 (10-YR) E-MAILED—
Sep 17, 2024NA75NOTICE OF ACCEPTANCE OF SEC. 71 & 15 - E-MAILED—
Sep 17, 2024C75AREGISTERED - SEC. 71 ACCEPTED & SEC. 15 ACK.—
May 16, 2024APRECASE ASSIGNED TO POST REGISTRATION PARALEGAL—
Mar 11, 2024APRECASE ASSIGNED TO POST REGISTRATION PARALEGAL—
Jun 30, 2023ES75TEAS SECTION 71 & 15 RECEIVED—
Mar 11, 2023ADCHCHANGE OF NAME/ADDRESS REC'D FROM IB—
Jan 3, 2022REM3COURTESY REMINDER - SEC. 71 (6-YR) E-MAILED—
Sep 8, 2017FINOFINAL DECISION TRANSACTION PROCESSED BY IB—
Apr 5, 2017XXSSGENERIC MADRID TRANSACTION SENT TO IB—
Apr 5, 2017XXCRGENERIC MADRID TRANSACTION CREATED—
Apr 3, 2017FICRFINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB—
Jan 3, 2017R.PRREGISTERED-PRINCIPAL REGISTERYour trademark is registered on the Principal Register — the strongest form of federal trademark protection. You may use the ® symbol for the covered goods and services. Maintenance filings (Section 8 and renewals) are required to keep the registration alive.
Oct 28, 2016OPNXNOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION - PROCESSED BY IB—
Oct 18, 2016NPUBOFFICIAL GAZETTE PUBLICATION CONFIRMATION E-MAILED—
Oct 18, 2016PUBOPUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITIONYour mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance.
Sep 28, 2016OPNSNOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION SENT TO IB—
Sep 28, 2016OP2RNOTICE OF START OF OPPOSITION PERIOD CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB—
Sep 28, 2016NONPNOTIFICATION OF NOTICE OF PUBLICATION E-MAILED—
Sep 14, 2016PREVLAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED—
Sep 7, 2016CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER—
Sep 7, 2016XAECEXAMINER'S AMENDMENT ENTERED—
Sep 7, 2016GNENNOTIFICATION OF EXAMINERS AMENDMENT E-MAILED—
Sep 7, 2016GNEAEXAMINERS AMENDMENT E-MAILED—
Sep 7, 2016CNEAEXAMINERS AMENDMENT -WRITTEN—
Jun 2, 2016GNS3NOTIFICATION OF LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED—
Jun 2, 2016GNSLLETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED—
Jun 2, 2016CNSLSUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN—
May 13, 2016TEMETEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED—
May 13, 2016CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
May 9, 2016ALIEASSIGNED TO LIE—
Apr 27, 2016TROATEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Jan 31, 2016RFNTREFUSAL PROCESSED BY IB—
Jan 13, 2016RFCSNON-FINAL ACTION MAILED - REFUSAL SENT TO IB—
Jan 13, 2016RFRRREFUSAL PROCESSED BY MPU—
Jan 12, 2016RFCRNON-FINAL ACTION (IB REFUSAL) PREPARED FOR REVIEW—
Jan 11, 2016CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Jan 8, 2016DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Nov 20, 2015MAFRAPPLICATION FILING RECEIPT MAILED—
Nov 16, 2015NWOSNEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED—
Nov 14, 2015REPRSN ASSIGNED FOR SECT 66A APPL FROM IB—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance